CHRISTMAS 2022 – Part B

            I begin Part B with the second portion of CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HEALING because it is about Mary Baker Eddy’s Light, the result that comes from her Life work.

THE VIGNETTE of MARY BAKER GLOVER EDDY

            Why was the portrait of Mary Baker Eddy ever removed from the fronts of Miscellaneous Writings and the Christian Science Textbook SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES?

            In Helen’s book, IF MARY BAKER EDDY’S MANUAL WERE OBEYED, on page 97-a, she has the above picture of Mary Baker Eddy, however, instead of in type where we see her name, as seen above, is found Mary Baker Eddy’s actual signature (as seen directly below).  The SCIENCE AND HEALTH books that came out in the 1990s (not put out by The Christian Science Publishing Society) do have her picture and signature in them, as seen below.  I accidentally erased the year 1910 so it is missing at the bottom of the title page (i).

WHAT WOULD JESUS SAY TODAY?

            What if Christ Jesus were on earth today?  What if he was on every television network, every social media site, and on every radio station all at the same time giving us the same message?  Would we as a society believe what he was telling us; or would we think he was being cruel and try to cancel him?

            What if Jesus said to us, “I Am more immune to the coronavirus than if I had received the covid 19 vaccinations or contracted coronavirus”?

JOSEPH’S MODERN DAY SAGA – Part 2

The New Jerusalem artichoke matrix

            “Note that the chapter ‘Recapitulation’ is composed of twenty-four questions and answers, the first of which answers the fundamental question, ‘What is God?’   Understanding the answer to this foremost question restores Adam’s severed rib [covenant with God], or gives back to manhood its otherwise separated womanhood

Adam’s Son

            “Adam.  Error; a falsity; the belief in ‘original sin,’ sickness, and death; evil; the opposite of good, — of God and His creation; a curse; a belief in intelligent matter, finiteness, and mortality; ‘dust to dust;’ red sandstone[1]; nothingness; the first god of mythology; not God’s man, who represents the one God and is His own image and likeness; the opposite of Spirit and His creations; that which is not the image and likeness of good, but a material belief, opposed to the one Mind, or Spirit; a so-called finite mind, producing other minds, thus making ‘gods many and lords many’ (I Corinthians viii. 5); a product of nothing as the mimicry of something; an unreality as opposed to the great reality of spiritual existence and creation; a so-called man, whose origin, substance, and mind are found to be the antipode of God, or Spirit; an inverted image of Spirit; the image and likeness of what God has not created, namely, matter, sin, sickness, and death; the opposer of Truth, termed error; Life’s counterfeit, which ultimates in death; the opposite of Love, called hate; the usurper of Spirit’s creation, called self-creative matter; immortality’s opposite, mortality; that of which wisdom saith, ‘Thou shalt surely die.’

“GENESIS” and “THE APOCALYPSE” – Part 2

“Last sixteen sections of Adam record correlative with the sixteen sections of text that make up ‘The Apocalypse,’ and correlative also with the first sixteen chapters of SCIENCE AND HEALTH

The Christian Science Textbook – Part 2

Seven Days Part 2

[Truth as Principle – Man’s oneness with God (Principle) is expressed in the wholeness of manhood and womanhood – one-in-all and all-in-one – and Soul as the Christ as the Christ within the Word as Christianity]
Genesis 1. 27.  So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him, male and female created He them.

Ideal man and woman
            To emphasize this momentous thought, it is repeated that God made man in His own image, to reflect the divine Spirit.  It follows that man is a generic term.  Masculine, feminine, and neuter genders are human concepts.  In one of the ancient languages the word for man is used also as the synonym of mind.  This definition has been weakened by anthropomorphism, or a humanization of Deity.  The word anthropomorphic, in such a phrase as “an anthropomorphic God,” is derived from two Greek words, signifying man and form, and may be defined as a mortally mental attempt to reduce Deity to corporeality.  The life-giving quality of Mind is Spirit, not matter.  The ideal man corresponds to creation, to intelligence, and to Truth.  The ideal woman corresponds to Life and to Love.  In divine Science, we have not as much authority for considering God masculine, as we have for considering Him feminine, for Love imparts the clearest idea of Deity.
            [Think about it, if man is actually a synonym of mind then why are today’s Left (those who claim to be feminists or on the feminists’ side?) so against the word?  Why do they think it is a horrible word and why do they sick the thought police on it and try to change words like manhole?  I will go so far in saying that mentality could mean “mantality”.  The reason why the Left is against the word has nothing to do with sexual inequality and everything to do with the anti-Christ.

WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE BIBLE?

            Before I speak about the difference between the two creation accounts I would like to present to you an excerpt from a book called FROM REVELATION TO GENESIS, written by Englishman, W. Gordon Brown.  In these few pages, beginning on page 10, he explains how the BIBLE came to be written.  (I always capitalize the word BIBLE entirely (unless I am quoting another source) because I feel it points to the importance of the masculine BIBLE over all other books, besides its feminine mate, in the world.)  [In this first section my interpolations will be in this type of bracket.]

Bible Prophecy Fulfilled

“The Woman”

            “The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.”  “I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.” (Matthew 13:33, 35)

            In Bliss Knapp’s book Destiny of The Mother Church he tells us about how the parable of the woman, told to us by Jesus, was kept secret from the foundation of the world, that it “implies that she was no ordinary woman and that her mission must be unique” (Destiny, p. 185).  His twelfth chapter (that seems to be in synch with Revelation’s twelfth chapter) is about Mary Baker Eddy and how she fulfilled Bible prophecy.  And this is the reason why the Board of Directors did not want his book to be read by Christian Scientists in the late 1940’s and why they really did not want to publish it in the early 1990’s.