What is a MOB?

by MJSmith

            Recently the mainstream (Liberal) Media have tried to erase the word “mob” when used to describe leftist groups who are harassing Republicans or people they just plain do not like.  One example: opinion news commentator Tucker Carlson.  Just this week a Leftist group gathered around his house.  His wife was the only one home, he was at work (which I bet they knew), and fortunately their children were not at home.  Mrs. Carlson did not know what was going on but she did call 911 for help.  These people (Antifa) were yelling out and trying to break down the front door.  These people were not protesters, as they pretend to be or call themselves, no, they were vandals and they were also a MOB!
            Let me go to the dictionary (Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary) to tell you what the word “mob” actually means – and let us see if the mainstream (Liberal-Socialist) Media actually is correct in trying to get people to stop using the word “mob”.  Should they really be shushing their guests?  Do not their guests have the “freedom of speech”?

mob [L mibile Vlugus vacillating[1] crowd]  1:  the lower classes of a community:  masses, rabble  2:  a large or disorderly crowd:  esp:  one bent on riotous or destructive action  3 chiefly Austral:  a flock, drove, or herd of animals  4:  a criminal set:  gang  sny see crowd—mobbish

mob vi mobbed; mobbing  1:  to crowd about and attack or annoy (mobbed by autograph hunters before he could enter the theater)  2:  to crowd into or around (customers mob the store on sale days)

            So any group of people can be considered to be a crowd – or a mob.  I will not say that those harassing the Republicans, or even ordinary citizens are lower class, but Antifa sure can be described as being “a large and a disorderly crowd:  esp:  one bent on riotous or destructive action”!  And they certainly wind up acting like “animals” and “a criminal set”.  Anyone that confronted people like Senator Flake on an elevator, or anyone recently in a public restaurant or airport, is certainly annoying!  So, the leftist (communist) mainstream media is incorrect in their assumption of what the word “mob” actually means.  We no longer need to take anyone on CNN or MSNBC or NBC or any other Left wing media company seriously, especially since they do not happen to know what the simple word “mob” means.
            If the word vacillating actually does have to do with a virus, we must ask what a virus does.  It invades something, like a body and makes the body sick; a computer virus invades the pure computer programming and corrupts it.  So is not the “mob” of a caravan of travelers in the south (from Central America) not a virus?  Is it not an “invasion” as President Trump has referred to it?  It most certainly is.  Why would these caravans be an invasion to the United States of America?  They would be an invasion because these people intend on corrupting the United States of America via disease (that they may be carrying), via illegal drugs they bring across the boarder, and by breaking our (what should be) sacred laws.  They are a big mob – thus, it is a big invasion.  Now, let us look up the word “invasion” in the dictionary.

invasion [ME invasioune, fr. MF invasion, fr.  LL invasion-, invasio, fro. L invasus, pp. of invadere1:  an act of invading:  esp:  incursion of an army or conquest or plunder  2:  the incoming or spread of something usu. hurtful.

            The caravan of people may not seem to be an army, but look at what they did in order to cross into the Mexican boarder – they took down the fence and they hurt police officers, thus, they were “hurtful” to property and persons.  If they actually do enter into the United States of America they could be harmful (hurtful) to our economy.  Who knows what the results could be if billions of people keep coming into this country?  There are already over 22,000 illegal citizens in the United States of America.  The caravan was an “incursion” to Mexico.  An incursion is “a hostile entrance into a territory; an entering in or into”.  So “opinion” CNN news man Jim Acosta (a man who will accost you) is right when he says that the caravan of people are not an invasion to our country, but only because they have not reached our boarders yet.  However, for sure they were an incursion to Mexico and they will be to the U.S. once they get to our boarder.
            The word “invasive” means:  “2:  tending to spread  3:  tending to infringe”[2].  So what does “infringe” mean?    “1:  defeat, frustrate  2:  to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another…syn.  trespass”[3].  Is not the goal of these caravans to violate the law of the United States of America by illegally crossing our southern boarder?  Is not the goal of these caravans to violate the rights of legal United States citizens when they are able to get drivers licenses (Identification) so that they can eventually register to vote for the Democrats?  Is not the goal of these caravans to violate the rights of legal United States citizens when they drive cars without insurance and they cause accidents or deaths (many of the illegal people drive intoxicated also)?  Some of them are willing to shoot legal U.S. citizens with guns or stab them with knifes.  How many of them are gang members?  We do not know.  How many are smuggling drugs across the boarder?  We do not know.  How many of them are trafficking people?  We do not know.  How many of them are coming into our country just to receive welfare money?  How many of them after getting a job in order to send that money back to their own home country; even though this money came from United States taxpayers?
            Can you see now that these people in the caravans, even though some may be really nice people and really do need a better place to live, are taking advantage of our laws (the way they were set up by the Republicans and Democrats alike)!
            I said it before, and I’ll say it again, it does not matter what race these people are, if they were 100% white I still would not want them to come into our country illegally.  They should not be rewarded after breaking our laws or even taking advantage of our laws.


            I ordered the BLU-RAY movie:  DEATH OF A NATION Can We Save America A Second Time?  Dinesh D’Souza made the movie.  He also published a book with the same title, but I was unable to find a copy of it.  I am glad that I was able to get a copy of the movie.
            In the movie he spoke a great deal about Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany during World War II.  What surprised me was that George Soros was part of the Nazi party when he was a young adult.  I have been calling him a communist when all this time he is really a fascist!  Yet, as D’Souza explains – Adolf Hitler based his fascism upon the American’s Leftist Progressives (communism)!  In other words, he patterned his German policies after the Progressives in the United States of America, the Democrats.  It is a proven point that the Democratic Party originated the KKK (racists against blacks).
            D’Souza also explained that after the war was over that the American Progressives liked Hitler’s fascism, however, they decided to spread the lies that fascism (white supremacy) was all part of the Right (the Republicans).  They worked and worked at this in order to make the world believe that it was the Right who had adopted fascism, when in all reality it is the Left that utilizes its tactics.  One could say that communism is like the head of a coin while fascism is like the tail of a coin – they are one and the same coin, they are both totalitarianism.
            This explains the George Soros groups like Antifa (which is supposed to be anti-fascist but is not) and Black Lives Matter.  And it has very little to do with race, but everything to do with gaining power and more power while making slaves out of society.
            Another thing that D’Souza made clear in his movie is that Hitler called himself a nationalist.  Hitler did not like the globalist communists – yet the way these two groups do things are more similar than dissimilar.  So when the Left Media speaks about President Trump being a nationalist, or even the French President hints at this, they are not speaking about true nationalism but rather, they are speaking about Adolf Hitler’s idea of nationalism (which is a counterfeit of true nationalism).

nationalism:  loyalty and devotion to a nation esp:  a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups.” (Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary)

            There is nothing wrong with President Trump promoting and exalting the United States of America over the rest of the world.  It is not like he totally ignores other countries, it is not like he does not also want them to receive goodness.  He is not like Adolf Hitler; he does not rage war against other countries.  If he were like Hitler he would have never tried to make peace with North Korea.  Real nationalism brings about patriotism while false nationalism (Hitler’s type) brings about tribalism.  Recently I heard someone say that when you place the word “white” with “nationalism” – as “white nationalism” you change the meaning of nationalism.  Is not “white nationalism” really false nationalism, the kind that Hitler promoted?  I know that President Trump believes in true nationalism, that which brings about patriotism.  True nationalism is for building up one’s own nation to be the best that it can be, while false nationalism dis-unifies the nation into groups or clicks or mobs.  In fact, I will go as far as to say that false nationalism is based upon the idea of diversity.  Who is it that constantly speaks about diversity today?  It is the Left.  Diversity does not unite groups; on the contrary, diversity dis-unifies the country.  And the Progressives know this all too well.  “United we stand – divided [diversified] we fall.”  This explains why the Left is so strong on diversification today and trying to make it so important.  Are we going to fall for their playbook trickery?
            D’Souza compared today to the time of the Civil War.  He says that in comparison President Abraham Lincoln and President Donald Trump have much in common, in regards to what is taking place in the nation of the United States of America.  Both have had to fight against the prejudiced, race-baiting Democrats.
            What many United States of America citizens fail to understand is the fact that this country is God’s Country.  God set up the United States of America so that one specific thing would be able to take place.
            Mary Baker was born on a Monday (moon-day – she would have her feet upon the moon, have dominion over matter), on July 16, 1821.  She grew up in New England (New Hampshire), in a town called Bow.

            “And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations.  I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.  And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud.  And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.  And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.  And God said to Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.”  (Genesis 9:12-17)

            A token is a symbol or a sign.  What does the cloud symbolize or stand for?  The cloud is a divine messenger – a Christ coming or Christ Advent.  So from Genesis we now go to the end of the BIBLE – to the book of Revelation, chapter 10 where we find this token cloud being explained to you as the second coming of Christ (even though it is not explained as being the second coming of Christ by John).
            “And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud:  and a rainbow was upon his [her] head, and his [her] face was as it were the sun, and his [her] feet as pillars of fire:  And he [she] had in his [her] hand a little book open:  and he [she] set his [her] right foot upon the sea, and his [her] left foot on the earth, … [Notice that in the Illustration below that Mary Baker Eddy’s left foot is visible.]

First Edition

“…And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion [one who is born under the sign of Leo – the first living creature for the Word of God] roareth:  and when he [she] had cried, seven thunders [the seven names, or seven synonymous terms, for God] uttered their voices.  And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I [St. John, a male] was about to write:  and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not [for the world is not yet ready for My Truth and it will be the woman who is to deliver (give birth to) my Word].  And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his [her] hand to heaven,

First Edition

“…And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer.” (Revelation 10:1-6; [My interpolations and my infuses.])

First Edition

            Who is the goddess of the rainbow?  Iris.  So even though John refers to this Sixth Angel [a divine messenger for the Sixth Day of Truth] in masculine pronouns he is hinting at the fact that this angel is female – for her “face was as it were the sun”.  I say this because John did not just say “bow” as used in Genesis, he actually used “rainbow” which is reference to the goddess (feminine) Iris.

            “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:  And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.  And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.  And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth:  and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child [Christian Science] as soon as it was born.  And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron:  and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.” (Revelation 12:1-5 [My interpolations.])
            The Grandmother clock, in the third Illustration of Christ and Christmas, depicts 12:05 (that there should be time no longer).  This “time” points us to Revelation 12:1-5 which tells us about the woman God-crowned.  Yet, this depicted time also points us to The First Church of Christ Scientist’s Rose Window on its southern wall.  The name of this window is WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK (the open book is SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES – the same book that the angel of Revelation 10 descends with in her hand).  This particular Keystone depicts the woman God-crowned.  She is standing upon a crescent moon.

Woman God-crowned Keystone

            The red dragon, of course, is depicted in this third Illustration as the red serpent (Adam mortal minded wisdom based upon animal magnetism) hissing behind the woman in SEEKING AND FINDING.
            There is, however, more explained in Revelation 10 about what was to come in the Sixth and Seventh days of Truth and Love.

            “But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel [during the Seventh Day of Love], when he [she] shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished [due to the second coming of Christ-Truth], as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.  And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me [St. John] again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.  And I went unto the angel, and said unto him [her], Give me the little book.  And he [she] said unto me, Take it, and eat it up [spiritually dissect the Word of God]; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.  And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey; and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.  And he [she] said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.” (Revelation 10:7-11 [My interpolations.])

            “Mortals, obey the heavenly evangel.  Take divine Science.  Read this book [SCIENCE AND HEALTH] from beginning to end.  Study it, ponder it.  It will be indeed sweet at its first taste, when it heals you; but murmur not over Truth, if you find its digestion bitter.  When you approach nearer and nearer to this divine Principle, when you eat the divine body of this Principle, — thus partaking of the nature, or primal elements, of Truth and Love, — do not be surprised nor discontented because you must share the hemlock cup and eat the bitter herbs; for the Israelites of old at the Paschal meal thus prefigured this perilous passage out of bondage into the El Dorado of faith and hope.” (S&H 559:19-31 [My interpolation.])

            The angel of the Seventh Day of Love is also feminine.  She is depicted in the seventh Illustration of Christ and Christmas.

First Edition

            This is the ONLY Illustration from Mary Baker Eddy’s poem book that has the “little book open”.  However, the BIBLE is a closed book.  It sits upon the round (circular) matrix table by the old man of scholastic theology.  There is a Grandfather clock behind the old man (who sees through a glass darkly).  It has the depicted time of 5:25 – which points us to Revelation 5:1-5.

            “And I saw in the right hand of him [her] that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals.  And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open [decipher the code message within] the book [of Revelation], and to loose the [seven] seals [placed upon the book in order to hamper any attempts at tampering with the Word of God] thereof?  And no man in heaven [of the Third Degree], nor in earth [of the Second Degree], neither under the earth [of the First Degree], was able to open the book [of Revelation], neither to look thereon.  And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and read the book, neither to look thereon [but a woman would be found worthy].  And one of the [twenty-four] elders saith unto me.  Weep not:  behold the Lion [Leo – the Word of God] of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.” (Revelation 5:1-5 [My interpolation.])

            The reason why I feel that the book John speaks of is his own book, Revelation, is because when Revelation was written there was no BIBLE.  However, what he saw as a book could have been a vision of the BIBLE.  Yet, I feel that if one can understand the matrix structure of Revelation then one can also understand the matrix structure of the BIBLE as a whole.  Thus, it is because Revelation (and the BIBLE) was a closed book it had to be opened up.  But by who was it to be opened up?  It would have to be the Sixth Angel of Truth – Michael – Mary Baker Glover Eddy.  She would come to explain three sections of Revelation in her Textbook – chapters 10, 12, and 21-22.  These three sections (based upon four chapters) are about the little book open, the woman God-crowned, and the Holy City.  Yet, is the girl depicted in the Seventh Illustration a depiction of Mary Baker as a child?  I do not believe she is.  Some Christian Scientists think the girl only represents child thought – that which is willing to accept Truth unquestioningly.  And perhaps this is part of what the girl symbolizes, however, I think she means much more.  Why would the wooden chair that she sits upon have weird perspective to it?  Why did the artist draw the rungs of the chair like he did?  He understood perspective.  I believe it is because the chair, which is foursquare, represents a pyramid.  I believe that the rungs of the chair are symbolic of a ramp that wraps around the pyramid – the Major Pyramid Matrix of Truth.  There is only one person I know of that has worked with the Major Pyramid Matrix of Truth and that is myself.  I believe that the girl depicts the Seventh Angel – Gabriel – for the Seventh Day of Love – a time that is already upon us.  And these two feminine angels are depicted in the fifth Illustration – CHRISTMAS MORN.

First Edition

            Originally Mary Baker Eddy asked her artist to place three female angels in this Illustration.  However, this did not happen.  Is it possible that the three female angels were supposed to be representations of the three Mothers of Christ – the Virgin Mary (Mother to Jesus), Mary Baker Eddy (Mother to Christian Science), and Martha (Mother Hood – the consciousness of Love that explains Mary Baker Eddy to the world)?
            So, why is the United States of America the birthing place for Christian Science?  “And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:  And I will give him the MORNING STAR.” — Jesus Christ.
            Another name for the Morning Star is Venus.  Venus is a symbol for the woman God-crowned for it transits the sun (becomes clothed with the sun) but it, the planet, is also clothed with a cloud (like the angel of Revelation 10), as its sky is total cloud cover.  During the main history of the United States of America Venus has traversed the sun six times.  The first two times (eight years apart – it takes eight years for Venus to plot the course or pattern of a five pointed star), that I am going to count,[4] were on June 5, 1761 and June 3rd and 4th, 1769 (I am thinking it was mostly on the 4th).  This was an important time that took place before the American Revolution, or when our country would be born as a nation – a united nation consisting of United States.  It was in 1761 that the cloud coverage of Venus was discovered – in other words it had an atmosphere of some kind.  Also of symbolic importance is the fact that both of these transits took place on Friday (if we use June 4, 1769 instead of June 3, 1769).  Venus is the planet, and goddess, used for Friday.  However, it is a fact that the day was probably named for the Norse goddess Frigg, Odin’s wife.  She represents foreknowledge and wisdom.  It is interesting that the year given for the illustration below just happens to be 1882, the same year of the second transit during Mary Baker Eddy’s God-crowned mission!

            The third and fourth transits took place on Wednesdays.  Wednesday was named after Woden (Odin) the king of the Norse gods.  He is supposed to have created the human race from ash and alder trees.  Could these two trees be symbolic of the tree of knowledge of good and evil (ashes to ashes) and the tree of life (alder)?  And alder is a type of birch tree, which means “bright”.  However, an alder is also an ash tree.  So could the alder tree represent the same tree – the tree of life Science (Bright) being misinterpreted by the human race as being the tree of good (spirit) and evil (matter) mixed up into one tree – or rather – one material body called Adam?  Odin was also said to have established the laws of the universe.  The Roman symbol for Wednesday is the planet and god Mercury.  Mercury was the messenger of the gods and a patron of science.  Mercury’s feet were like the element of mercury (supposedly) – is this not reminiscent of the angel of Revelation 10 who has feet of fire?
            The third time that Venus traversed the sun took place slightly before what is depicted in Illustration 3 of Christ and Christmas of SEEKING AND FINDING.  Venus (also the Star of Bethlehem and the Star of Boston) is the star shining down upon Mary Baker Glover on December 9, 1874.  According to Helen Wright’s book (Star of Boston…), Mary Baker Glover lived at Number 8 Broad Street at this time, however, this is not correct.  It is possible that Helen just got the wrong year put down in her book (she put 74 instead of 75.  According to Doris Grekel, in (The Discovery) her first biography on Mary Baker Eddy, she says that it was not until March 1875 that Mary Glover moved from Number 9 to Number 8 Broad Street.  However, it was in the spring of 1874 (before the transit) that Mary Baker Glover “was ready to present her manuscript to a publisher once more, and again it was rejected.”[5]  “By summer Mary had completed her manuscript to her own satisfaction and had it copyrighted on the seventh of July [of 1874].  Shortly thereafter she was able to make arrangements with a printer to print the book at her expense.  In her notebook she wrote:  ‘September 6, 1874.  Sent my mss. to the printer to commence work.  The work is entitled The Science of Life.’”[6]  She would not be able to publish her book under this title because there was already a book with that title.  So, the 3rd Illustration actually depicts Mary Baker Glover writing only the final chapter in her dealing with animal magnetism (at Number 8 Broad Street).  She wrote about this experience:

            “My reluctance to give the public, in my first edition of Science and Health, the chapter on Animal Magnetism {which was titled “Healing the Sick”}, and the divine purpose that this should be done, may have an interest for the reader, and will be seen in the following circumstances.  I had finished that edition as far as that chapter, when the printer informed me that he could not go on with my work.  I had already paid him seven hundred dollars, and yet he stopped my work.  All efforts to persuade him to finish my book were in vain.
            “After months had passed, I yielded to a constant conviction that I must insert my last chapter a partial history of what I had already observed of mental malpractice.  Accordingly, I set to work, contrary to my inclination, to fulfill this painful task, and finished my copy for the book.  As it afterwards appeared, although I had not thought of such a result, my printer resumed his work at the same time, finished printing the copy he had on hand, and then started for Lynn to see me.  [At the same time] I started for Boston with my finished copy.  We met at the Eastern depot in Lynn, and were both surprised, — I to learn that he had printed all the copy on hand, and had come to tell me he wanted more, — he to find me en route for Boston, to give him the closing chapter of my first edition of Science and Health.  Not a word had passed between us, audibly or mentally, while this went on.  I had grown disgusted with my printer, and become silent.  He had come to a standstill through motives and circumstanced unknown to me.” (Retrospection and Introspection 37:21-38:26 [My interpolation, based upon Helen Wright’s interpolation in her book Star of Boston The Life of Mary Baker Eddy.]  {My interpolation.})

            This being said, it makes perfect since that we see the serpent behind the woman, with its forked tongue of double speak (lies) and its human teeth (the lies come from personal sense).  SCIENCE AND HEALTH was published on October 30, 1975, almost eleven months after the transit of Venus.  It seems clear to me that SEEKING AND FINDING deals with Revelation 12 even more than I have suspected, because the 3rd Illustration does not really reflect the bulk of SCIENCE AND HEALTH being written, but only its final chapter.  So the importance of the time on Grandmother’s clock points us directly to Revelation 12:1-5 – and represents the Woman God-crowned Keystone’s position in WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK.  But it also depicts the red dragon serpent (the dragging on of all facets of the anti-Christ) behind the woman.  It is interesting to point out that although we see only one serpent in most editions that in the first edition of Christ and Christmas there are more serpents in the Illustration.  The other (six?) serpents are like wisps of smoke, the invisible error that is not seen by the five physical senses, but nonetheless seem to be present.
            In 1881 the third edition of SCIENCE AND HEALTH was published and the teaching manuscript used in classes, Science of Man, became a chapter in the Textbook called “Recapitulation”.  In July of 1882 Calvin Frye would receive a telegram from Mary Baker Eddy.  They met on a train in August and he became her private secretary.  He would be a great help to her from that point onward.  Did she reveal to him “the fact of such moment to the race that Mind had so recently revealed to her, i.e., her own identity as the Woman of the Apocalypse?”[7]

            “Mary Baker Eddy went forward.  Because of the tremendous amount of work now involved, Mrs. Eddy at this time organized the Christian Science Association, to help carry the load.
            “A bitter blow came to Mary with the death of her beloved husband, Dr. Asa Gilbert Eddy, on June 3, 1882.  Mrs. Eddy retired to a student’s home in Vermont to regain her peace and to find healing.  The healing came.  {Doris Grekel writes, in one of her biography THE DISCOVERY, that during this time Mary began to write letters to friends hinting at herself as the woman God-crowned.}
            “On returning home Mrs. Eddy wrote in her Bible:  ‘Aug. 6th, 1882…opened to Isaiah 54.’  One of the comforting verses she read there was, ‘thou…shalt not remember the reproach of thy widowhood any more.’  Soon she was able to tell a student, ‘The ship of Science is again walking the wave, rising above the billows, bidding defiance to the flood-gates of error, for God [her own right Mind, “the kingdom of God within” her consciousness] is at the helm.’
            “The Christian Science field was now to see a great outreach.  In 1882, following her return from her retreat in Vermont after Dr. Eddy’s death, Mrs. Eddy delivered an address on Christian healing in the Methodist temple in Barton.  This was a subject ever in her heart.
            The Christian Science Journal appeared in April, 1883 {about four months after the second Venus transit}.  Mrs. Eddy served as editor and wrote much of the Journal’s contents.  Mrs. Eddy’s work was hard and arduous, seven days a week, with little leisure.  She rested solely in the love for the work, and the love for God (infinite good).”[8]

            The forth time that Venus traversed the sun was December 6, 1882.[9]  At this time Mary Baker Eddy was 61 years old, however, “those who knew her…said she had the youthful appearance of a woman in her thirties or early forties.”[10]
            Before the second transit took place Mary Baker Eddy knew her place in Bible prophesy.  She tells us, “The twelfth chapter of the Apocalypse, or Revelation of St. John, has a special suggestiveness in connection with the nineteenth century.  In the opening of the sixth seal, typical of six thousand years since Adam, the distinctive feature has reference to the present age [which is the nineteenth century].” (S&H 559:32-560:5; [My interpolation.])  So which Illustration points us to 1882?  I strongly believe that it is Illustration 6 because it is the next Illustration depicting the MORNING STAR.  (The Morning Star is found in Illustrations 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 only.  However, the Morning Star’s presence is hinted at in Illustrations 9, 10, and 11.)

Christian Science Healing

Christian Science Healing (with the man and white mantle)

            Is it not possible that while Mary Baker Eddy unseals the closed book (which is the BIBLE containing Revelation) from its seven seals of error[11] – the belief that man is separated from God, the belief that man does not reflect Mind, Spirit, Soul, Principle, Life, Truth, and Love – that it was left up to a later generation (someone of the Seventh Day of Love, yet born at the tail end of the Sixth Day of Truth) to open up SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES so that its’ Unity Matrix can be explained in comparison with WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK?  And the girl who unseals the book of Revelation does it with the open book known as SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES.  Thus, the Word as the Word tone, in the Rose Window (seen below), depicts the Open Bible Keystone!

            Is not the reason why there are three advents of Christ why there are three important windows, modeled after three Illustrations from Christ and Christmas, depicted in Mother’s Room of The First Church of Christ Scientist, in Boston, Massachusetts?  These three windows are STAR OF BETHLEHEM (which has a second name – STAR OF BOSTON), SEEKING AND FINDING (which I have renamed “T’IS THE SAME HAND THAT WRITES THE PAGE”), AND “SUFFER THE CHILDREN TO COME UNTO ME”.  These three windows depict the Star-Flower of Venus – a Star of Bethlehem (with seven petals instead of six).

            In 1996, the very beginning of the Seventh Day of Love, I had a vision dream I titled:  THE ARCHER CLOUD.  I eventually realized that this cloud represented the constellation of Sagittarius.  Even though the cloud was not shaped like Sagittarius and it had an invisible bow and invisible arrow, it was positioned to shoot its invisible arrow toward the North (toward Boston).  I feel now that this Archer Cloud (divine messenger) represents Mary Baker Eddy’s two transits that took place in December, under the sign (signet) of the Archer – Sagittarius.
            And another hint that it had to do with the Morning Star during my mission is the fact that this Archer Cloud was supposed to resemble the artwork of one of Leonardo De Vinci’s masterpieces (even though there is no such painting or sculpture or drawing).

            In the dream the Archer Cloud had a triangular shape, as I commented upon its importance in the dream.  The pyramid is of importance to the first transit (in 2004).
            In the Seventh Day of Love Venus makes two more transits across the sun.  The first was on June 8, 2004 and the second was June 5, 2012.  The year before the first transit took place a book was published about the second coming of Christ in feminine form and the year following was the release of the same story as a movie.  The name of the book and movie is The De Vinci Code.  In this story the pyramid represented the male blade while the upside down pyramid represented the feminine cup.  When the cup and blade are unified they become the Star of David.  On the exact date of the second transit, June 5, 2012, Martha Jones-Smith’s website – The Ark of Truth – Mother’s Hood – was launched.  I had planned on launching it on June 6th because I had read that was the day of the actual transit, however, after putting up my site I found out that the transit actually took place on June 5th.  I had not planned it, but evidently God had!  In putting up my website, it was my intention to explain to the world the Truth about Mary Baker Eddy and how she fulfilled Bible prophecy as the angel of Revelation 10, as the woman God-crowned, and as the Bride – the Holy City of God.
            Both of my transits took place on a Tuesday.  Tuesday was named after the Norse god Tiw (Tyr).  Tiw lost one of his hands.  He is said to be a god of war (like Mars to the Romans) and associated with courage and combat, his female companion was named Zisa.

            Zisa has gone under the guise of Mary and she has her own feast day attributed to her, it is on September 28th.  She loosens knots, or takes care of the troubles in our lives.  She takes care of the “nots” in our lives – that which is not is seen for what it is nothing (matter, dust).  Is this not what a Christian Scientist does?
            Now to return to Tiw and how he became one handed.  There was this wolf named Fenris.   It was prophesied that Fenris would kill Odin.  To keep this from happening dwarves used magic to make a super leash, which was called Gleipnir, in order to restrain Fenris.  The only way Fenris would allow them to restrain him with Gleipnir was that someone had to place their hand in his mouth.  This someone would be Tiw, and that is how he lost his hand.  Gleipnir was supposed to be made up of items which seem impossible to get.  These six items are:  the noise that a cat makes in foot-fall (a cat always lands upon its feet), the beard of a woman (a beard is symbolic of a prophet, the beard of a woman would be the beard [the boldness and resolution] of a prophetess), roots of a rock (the root of David [or the Christ]), sinews of a bear (the strength of a witness to Truth [however, the moon goddess Diana (who would have her feet upon the moon?) is also symbolized by the bear and also the idea of virgin birth]), breath of a fish (the Holy Ghost), and the spittle of a bird (the woman’s Word).  Is not Fenris the representation of spiritual wickedness in high places?  So is not this super leash what restrains ecclesiastical despotism (the red dragon/wolf of hypocrisy) from killing Odin (the messenger of Wednesday)?
            It was Mary Baker Eddy’s mission to bring forth the second coming of Christ as Christian Science.  It was her mission to explain Jesus’ God-crowned mission, so that it would be understood to Christians.  It was her job to open up the BIBLE to unseal the seven seals of error (belonging to scholastic theology, ecclesiastical despotism, and materia medica – the anti-Christ).  While it is the God-crowned mission of Martha Jones-Smith to bring forth the third coming of Christ as generic man, it is left up to her to explain Mary Baker Eddy’s God-crowned mission, so that it will be understood to Christian Scientists and the world itself.  It is my job to open up the book of Revelation – to unseal the seven seals of error (belonging to scholastic theology, ecclesiastical despotism, and materia medica – the anti-Christ) by explaining its Mountain Range Matrix of Revelation and the Unity Matrix.
            Therefore, it is explained to you, the importance of the United States of America being the birthplace of Christian Science – so that it (as an open book) can open up the closed BIBLE via its very special transits of Venus – where it becomes, quite literally, clothed with the sun.
            Why does the woman God-crowned (the spiritual idea) have twelve stars to her circular crown (like the twelve stars in the outer cycle of WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK?  She explains it this way:  “The twelve tribes of Israel with all mortals, — separated by belief [dividing man up by the use of diversification] from man’s divine origin and the true idea, — will through much tribulation yield to the activities of the divine Principle of man in the harmony of Science.  These are the stars in the crown of rejoicing.  They are the lamps in the spiritual heavens of the age, which show the workings of the spiritual idea by healing the sick and the sinning, and by manifesting the light which shines ‘unto the perfect day’ as the night of materialism wanes.” (S&H 562:11-21 [My interpolation.])
            Jacob’s, or rather, Israel’s twelve sons became twelve tribes (which later on became twelve nations).  Then Moses made them thirteen tribes (see the book of Numbers).  The United States of America began with thirteen colonies (or thirteen tribes).  Yet these tribes had to become united – or they had to become one spiritual man – the generic man reflecting one divine Mind belonging to God.  The red dragon (ecclesiastical despotism and communism-fascism-totalitarianism) is the anti-Christ.  It fights all that Jesus did by claiming that Jesus is God (not God’s reflection) which leads to deification of a man, and it fights all that Mary Baker Eddy did by hiding who she is from the world and the members of her own Church.  Are you going to allow the anti-Christ to drown the spiritual ideal – the second coming of Christ’s manifestation as Mary Baker Glover Eddy?  The revelator and the revelation are one – they cannot be separated!
            Returning to the story of Noah, there was a recent movie made about the short BIBLE story.  However, the movie was different from the BIBLE story.  In the movie one of Noah’s sons is married and his wife gives birth to two daughters while they are on the ark.  I call these two girls Mary and Martha.  They represent the second and third coming of Christ during the Sixth Day of Truth and the Seventh Day of Love.  At the end of the movie the symbol of the bow in the cloud is quite different from that of a rainbow.  It was an arch of light (rainbow light) that went shooting out in all directions – as a circle of light.  It went out to the four corners of the earth.  Before I saw this Noah movie I had a dream.  I was standing behind an angel.  I knew that this angel was Mary Baker Eddy, the angel of Revelation 10.  As I stood behind her I saw the same type of arch-light shoot out from the angel’s conscious mind and it went out in all directions across the earth.  Is this not the bow consciousness of divine Mind going out to the nations of Israel – the consciousness that knows what Is Real?

            Children of Israel.  The representatives of Soul, not corporeal sense; the offspring of Spirit, who, having wrestled with error, sin, and sense, are governed by divine Science; some of the ideas of God beheld as men, casting out error and healing the sick; Christ’s offspring.” (S&H 583:5)

            It has been part of my mission to explain the Unity Matrix belonging to WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK.  Although the Unity Matrix was not original to me, for W. Gordon Brown presented it first in his book FROM GENESIS TO REVELATION, I have made it my own in its application to the Rose Window in The First Church (of Boston) and to Sharon’s Rose Matrix.  The poem stanza for CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HEALING speaks of Sharon’s rose.

“Christ was not crucified—that doom
            Was Jesus’ part;
For Sharon’s rose must bud and bloom
            In human heart.*

* “God was manifest in the flesh.”—St. Paul.

            Would not this footnote mean that God was manifest in the flesh as Jesus, Mary Baker Eddy, and generic man?
            Is it also possible that this Sharon’s rose might possibly be speaking about a picture slide presented in the 1970s by one of John W. Doorly’s students, as well as, the Rose Window – WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK – and its matrix structure that I have presented in my posts?  As far as I know, I am the only one who has compared the slide illustration of Christ and Christmas to WINDOW OF THE OPEN BOOK.  (The picture below is upside down.)

I call this Sharon’s Rose matrix for – Christ and Christmas

            Morning.  Light; symbol of Truth; revelation and progress.” (S&H 591:23)

            Who is to say that the book of Revelation was the last of revelation and progress?  Must not the light continue to grow and become brighter?  Would not the Morning Star represent continued revelation and progress?  The Morning Star is not the progress promoted by the Progressives!  The Progressives do not promote revelation and progress but the opposite.  They are the symbol of darkness; symbol of error.  The Progressives want to slowly lead the world into totalitarianism via a “one world order” with its mob mentality.  Christian Science leads generic man out of the darkness (material conscious thought) into the light (divine Mind) where Principle (God; spiritual order) and its idea (God’s image and likeness) is one.  “Thou shalt have no other God before me [Mind].”

[1] I could not find this word in the my dictionary, so I can only assume this word has to do with the word virus (diseased).

[2] Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

[3] Ibid

[4] I figure that there were two transits in the sixteen hundreds, probably around the 1640s or 1650s.

[5] THE DISCOVERY, by Doris Grekel, p. 131

[6] Ibid, p. 133 [My interpolation.]

[7] Ibid, p. 270

[8] Star of Boston The Life of Mary Baker Eddy, by Helen M. Wright, p. 56-57 [Helen Wright’s interpolation.]  {My interpolation.}

[9] In previous posts I erroneously have stated that both of these transits, during Mary Baker Eddy’s God-crowned mission, took place in early June of 1874 and 1882.  I stand corrected.  I should have gone on line to look into the facts!  For this I apologize to you.  Since writing this I have, hopefully, corrected all the incorrect posts on this topic.

[10] THE DISCOVERY, by Doris Grekel, p. 273-274

[11] “Seal.  The signet of error revealed by Truth.”  (S&H 593:23)