The Grey Men

by MJSmith

If the Left didn’t have double standards they would have no standards at all.

           The following is from a pamphlet I recently found at my parent’s house.  It was written quite a while ago, however, it is still beneficial in today’s world.  I have made a few literary changes and corrected mistakes I found in the copy.  [All of my interpolations will be in brackets for THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT.]  {I will sometimes use these types of brackets when I am interpolating other quoted material because the original author uses [brackets].}  [[And I use double brackets when I am quoting other material inside THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT if the quoted material already has interpolation brackets.]]
            Even though it was written fourteen years ago[1] it still applies today.  Only you can rest assured that the grey men (Insiders) of the shadow government have infiltrated the governments of the world even more than they had in 1993.  They are what President Trump refers to as “the swamp.”


By Richard D. Eastman, August 1993

            Before I begin the piece I would like to comment upon the symbolism of the above seal.  Richard D. Eastman has a picture of this seal (not this exact picture) on the over of his pamphlet.  Even though people like Richard D. Eastman may see it as having evil purposes, I believe that originally it had a good meaning behind it (as depicted below).  As you can see, the six-sided star encircles five different letters which spell out MASON (even though they do not follow in a circular motion).  For sure this is a Masonic symbol.  There are thirteen levels to the pyramid (fourteen if you include the capstone).  The thirteen levels represent the thirteen original colonies for the United States of America (hardly evil).  The Roman numeral on the bottom foundation stone reads “1776” – the year our country was legitimized as the United States of America (again, hardly evil).  Was the new kind of order really pointing to a one world government for globalism (evil)?  I do not think so.  I think it pointed to a new type of governmental order – that of the Individual being governed by God – where God as Principle and man as Principle’s idea IS one!  The omniscience (only Science or only knowledge of good) eye (viewpoint) belongs to God, the one Mind.  As Jesus said, “Let thine eye be single.”  This eye radiates like a sun.  However, this does not mean that the globalist (Insiders or grey men) do not misinterpret the meaning behind the seal and distort its meaning to bend the meaning to their mortal will of evil.

            The six pointed star, as used by the Hebrews, is symbolic of oneness – where man (Judah, the masculine blade) and woman (Israel, the feminine cup) are united as one.  Then, as depicted below, we see the two representatives of Christ united as one in Christian Science.  Notice the pyramid shape of light in CHRISTIAN UNITY (from Christ and Christmas, by Mary Baker Eddy).  Notice also the type of light depicted around Jesus’ head and Mary’s head.  It is not unlike the light seen around the eye of the U.S. Seal!  This halo light simply means (I think) that Jesus and Mary Baker Eddy were mentally tuned to divine Mind and that they manifested the Christ Mind.

First Edition


            In spite of the difficulties facing America, there is still no other place I would rather live.  Some say America has entered a “post-Christian” era.  Our currency still says “In God We Trust”.  But does America still trust in God?  [The answer is “No” when people cling to their doctors and medicine for a cure and count on big government programs to help feed them and support them.]
            In 1787, Benjamin Franklin cautioned his fellow peers with these words:  “We have been assured…in the Sacred Writings, that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.”
            Now, 206 years later, many of our political leaders seem to have forgotten that America is “one nation, under God”.
            Is God interested in the political affairs of man?  Colossians 1:16 says:  “For by Him all things were created; things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, or powers, or rulers, or authorities…”
            Would it not be against His Divine nature if He was remiss in any area of His creation, including civil governments?  Civil governments have been the major enslaving force in the history of mankind.  In the 20th Century alone we have seen:

1)  over 35 million battle-killed;
2)  over 199 million have died at the hands of oppressive governments.

            I Corinthians 7:23 says:  “You were bought at a price, do not become slaves of men.”

            Upon this premise rests our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.  All men are endowed by their Creator [divine Mind] with certain unalienable rights.  Our Founding Fathers’ devout belief in God can be summed up in George Washington’s statement:  “It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.”
            The wisdom and beliefs of men such as Washington established our Constitutional Republic [not democracy] which holds that:

1)  the state is the servant of the people (not the provider as Marxism teaches);;
2)  the Constitution is the supreme law of the land;
3)  a government which governs least, governs best.

            What has gone wrong?  We have:

1)  a President who endorses sodomy and abortion [I am not sure which President the author is speaking of.];
2)  legislators who have balanced the budget once since 1960;
3)  regulations that now cost the taxpayer over $460 billion per year and fill over 67,000 pages of the Federal Register.

            We have gone from the world’s largest creditor nation to the world’s largest debtor nation [especially after President Obama].  To whom does this nation owe over $4 trillion, which costs over $800 million per day interest to service?

            James 5:3 says:  “You have hoarded wealth in the last days.”

            To whom is James referring?  Does this have anything to do with the New World Order?

1)  what are its goals?
2)  who’s promoting it?
3)  how much power and influence do they have?
4)  how close is it?

            Think about these words spoken by James Madison in 1788 as the story unfolds:  “I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpation.”
            For centuries, international bankers have enjoyed a lucrative business by financing governments around the world, and command considerable influence in the policies of such governments.  [These international bankers also finance both sides of a war.  To them war is a win-win situation.]
            It has been profitable to them to encourage government debt.  Higher debt yields more interest.
            As there wealth accumulated, these banking empires eventually owned, as private corporations, various central banks of Europe, such as the Bank of England, the Bank of France, and the Bank of Germany.  These were privately owned monopolies, granted by heads of state, usually in return for loans.
            These monopolies found that money on demand was only a fraction of money on deposit.  By issuing paper bank notes, they created money out of nothing.  Through fractional banking, they amassed fortunes.  According to some, the House of Rothschild by 1850, had more wealth than the combined monarchies of Europe.
            Our Founders, aware that these European bankers sought a foothold here, framed our Constitution so that only Congress had the power over our monetary system.  [So this is why many of our Congress members today have been compromised.  This is why nothing ever gets accomplished by Congress that is beneficial to “The People”.]
            There are historians, however, that contend that the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Civil War were instigated by the European bankers in order to disrupt and control America’s economy.  [And you have been taught in school that the Civil War was about slavery!]
            By the end of the 19th Century, American industrialists and bankers, through the Industrial Revolution, had achieved a great wealth.  An excellent account of this is Matthew Josephson’s 1934 book, entitle:  The Robber Barons, the Great American Capitalists:  1861-1901.  (Harcourt, Brace and Co. New York 1934; available secondary market).
            The industrialists were known as “Big Business” and the Wall Street bankers as the “Money Trust”.  The most prominent of these was banker J. P. Morgan.  [These One World Order folk are also known as Insiders – and J. P. Morgan was an Insider.  Perhaps the term comes from “inside trading”?  I think it is because these Insiders infiltrate every material organization in the world and thus they become Insiders.]
            It was Morgan, working with the European banking dynasties, who created the “Financial Panic of 1907”.  This was an effort to manipulate Congress to approve of the central bank.
            In 1912, Woodrow Wilson became President.  His chief advisor and administrator was Colonel Edward Mandell House [he is a big Insider], who was a proponent of world government, a representative of the European banking dynasties, and had close ties with the Morgan interests.  [What this man symbolizes is the opposite of Mary Baker Eddy’s type of conscious thought, its direct opposite.]
            In 1912, House wrote a book, wherein he laid out a plan to bring America into a world government.  (Philip Dru:  Administrator by Col. Edward Mandell House, 1912; available at General Birch Services, P.O. Box 8040 Appleton, Wis. 54913-8040).  On page 222, he wrote:  “…our Constitution and our laws…are not only obsolete, but even grotesque.”  [How many democrats claim that the Constitution is obsolete today?  Many!]
            His plan, and to use his own words, “a conspiracy”, would seek to achieve:

1)  the establishment of a central bank;
2)  a progressive [notice the word progressive = Progressives] graduated income tax;
3)  control of both political parties in the United States. [I know this one has taken place.  It is why nothing ever seems to get done, except for communist programs – like Obama Care.]

            What was House’s goal?  “Socialism [communism] as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”  [Think of Bernie Sanders and his many supporters!]  House, who called himself the “unseen guardian angel” of the Federal Reserve Act, in concert with the Wall Street and European bankers, convinced President Wilson of the central bank concept.  The Federal Reserve Act was passed on Dec. 23, 1913 (by a vote of 298 to 60 in the House of Representatives, and 43 to 25 in the Senate).
            [What happened in 1913 in regards to the Christian Science Church?  “The October 1913 Christian Science Journal announced that practitioners who did not have class instruction with an authorized teacher would no longer have “C.S.” after their names in their Journal listing.  In Mrs. {Mary Baker Glover} Eddy’s day, all practitioners had the designation because they were her students via {the Textbook} Science and Health {WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES}.
            “The Christian Science[2] Sentinel of November 1, 1913, announced the publication of The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and Miscellany, which contained collected articles written by Mrs. Eddy after the publication of Miscellaneous Writings in 1896.  In addition, the Concordance to Other Writings by Mrs. Eddy was published in 1913 and joined the concordance for Science and Health, which had been completed in 1903 and later revised to incorporate changes she made up to and including 1910.
            “The year 1913 also inaugurated some disturbing actions by the Christian Science Board of Directors which have long since become commonplace.  Reverend G. A. Kratzer of Chicago had written an article, ‘Dominion Within’, which appeared in the February 29, 1908, Christian Science Sentinel.  Two days later, he received an autographed letter from Mary Baker Eddy, the first sentence of which was, ‘Your article, “Dominion Within”, is superb.’[3]  Other of his articles were also published in the periodicals.  The author was a former Protestant minister who had come into Christian Science and become a Journal-listed practitioner.  He found it helpful to write articles for his patients and give them to others as well.
            “He received a letter from the Board of Directors dated February 15, 1913:  ‘From time to time information has reached the officers of The Mother Church to the effect that your practice does not conform to the established usage of the Christian Science movement.  It is claimed that you violate the provisions of our Church Manual by the circulation of literature other than that which is published by our denomination and which correctly sets forth the teaching of Christian Science, and that you systematically furnish your patients with your own written formulas and articles in preference to the literature provided by our Leader and our Publishing Society.’
            “The letter ended with the invitation to resign his membership from The Mother Church.
            “In his reply to the Board, Rev. Kratzer assured the Directors that all of his patients owned the Bible and Science and Health[4] and that he recommended the periodicals to them.  He further explained:  ‘You speak for the fact that my articles were appearing occasionally in the periodicals.  How much does the appearing of a dozen articles in a year amount to, as a means of expression to a man whose mentality is so fertile that it would naturally produce an article every day?  How would it seem to Paderewski, if some one should say to him, “You ought to be satisfied if you are allowed to give a dozen concerts a year.”  I think that you and I can readily imagine about what kind of a reply Paderewski would make.  A man like Paderewski plays, not primarily “to be heard of men”, not even primarily to entertain or elevate men, but primarily because he is full of music; and to inhibit the musical expression of such a man would be to strike at his very life.  And it would not help him a particle to tell him that, for certain reasons, it was inexpedient that he should be allowed much musical expression but that he could express himself in painting all he cared to…’”[5]
            The letter continues on, needless to say, the Board was unmoved by his letter and sent him a blank form to request for his dismissal.  He signed it (which I think was a mistake to do), thus, his card was removed from the Journal and he was excommunicated from The SMother Church.
            At the end of 1913 there became a discrepancy between Chicago’s Edward M. Kimball’s teachings and Boston’s Mary Baker Eddy’s teachings.  The Associate Editor of The Journal, Annie M. Knott, was against the Kimball teachings while traitor board member Archibald McLellan (who was never a student of Mary Baker Eddy’s) was for the Kimball teachings.  Can there be any doubt that the reason why the Insiders were able to take over the U. S. Government is because of the disobedience – by the Boston Board of Directors – to the Church Manual estoppel clauses that force an end to material organized church?]
            After the vote [for the Federal Reserve Act], Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr. (father of the famous aviator) told Congress:  “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth…When the President signs this act, the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized…The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation…”  [These words are true so pay heed to them!]
            The Fed was then able to manipulate the money supply.  In the six years prior to the 1929 Stock Market Crash, the Fed increased (or inflated) the money supply 62%, inducing unwise investments and market speculation by the public.  When everything was in place, the bankers, who had been financing market speculation, called in their “24 hr. broker call loans”, precipitating the Crash.  They were then in a position to loan the government billions of dollars to finance the nation out of the Depression.  Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, (1920-1931) said this:  “It (the Depression) was not accidental.  The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.”
            How powerful is the Fed?  Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman of House Banking Committee (in the 60’s) said:  “In the United States today, we have in effect, two governments [Like two schools of Christian Science?]…we have the duly constituted government [the Boston school]…then we have an independent, uncontrolled, and uncoordinated government [the Chicago school] in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to the Congress by the Constitution.”
            The Fed has never been audited and has resisted all attempts to do so [sounds a lot like the Board of Director’s as well].  Archibald Roberts (Director of Committee to Restore the Constitution) began a campaign on March 30, 1971, testifying before Wisconsin legislators about the fraud surrounding the Fec.  (The text of his address is in the Congressional Record, E3212-E3224, entered April 19, 1971.)  Roberts and other constitutional groups (including Washington state Senator Jack Metcalf) had by the mid 80’s, acquired about 20 states’ support calling for audits/reforms, with no success.
            Again, in the late 80’s, Congressman Henry Gonzales (Texas) called for abolition of the Federal Open Market Committee and the repeal of the Federal Res. Act. (HR 1469, 1470).
            Congressman Phil Crane (Illinois) also introduced HR 70, calling for an audit (Currently, Gonzales and Crane are calling for an audit/reforms under HR 28 and 145; Senator Byron Dorgan, (North Dakota) is calling for a similar bill in the Senate, (S212).
            Since Wilson took Office, the national dept has risen from $1 billion to over $4 trillion – that is just “on budget” debt.  When added to the “off budget” debt of the S&L debacle and unfunded retirement liabilities, the total now exceeds our GDP.  [Today, thanks to President Obama, it is around 20 trillion dollars.]
            Is the country bankrupt?  Roosevelt [an Insider] declared so by Executive Orders (EO) 6073, 6102, 6111, and also by EO 6260 on March 9, 1933 (as proclaimed under the Trading With the Enemy Act, 65th Congress, Oct. 6, 1917, and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a, which allows the President exceptional control under a “state of emergency”).  On April 5, 1933, FDR issued EO 6102:  “All persons are required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates now owned by them to a Federal Reserve Bank, branch or agency, or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System.”  [Today it is highly suspected that Fort Knox is empty, that there is no gold in the place.]
            On June 5, 1933, Congress confirmed the bankruptcy (through the Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause, June 5, 1933).  This was HJR 192, 73rd Congress, 1st session.
            Then, through the Coinage Act of 1965 (79 Stat 254, USC 391), silver coinage was discontinued.  A one year grace period to redeem Silver Certificates was provided through another act on June 24, 1967 (81 Stat 77).  The Fed then bought silver from the Treasure for $1.29 / troy ounce.
            The Fed is not a government institution, and is not listed in phone directories under “government offices”.  It is a private corporation owned by approximately 300 Class A stockholders [Insiders].  These people own the Fed by owning the stock of the largest member banks in the New York Federal Reserve Bank, which, for all practical purposes, is the Federal Reserve.
            The controlling interest is held by less than a dozen international bankers, whose names, until recently, was one of the best-kept secrets of international finance:

1)  Rothschild Banks of London & Berlin;
2)  Lazard Bros. Banks of Paris;
3)  Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy;
4)  Warburg Bank of Hamburg & Amsterdam;
5)  Lehman Bros. Bank of New York;
6)  Kuhn, Loeb Bank of New York;
7)  Chase Manhattan Bank of New York;
8)  Goldman, Sachs Bank of New York.

            The most influential of the European interests is the Rothschild family in London. Each of the American interests is, in various ways, connected to this family, including the Rockefellers, who are by far the most powerful of the Fed.’s American stockholders (primarily through the Chase Manhattan Bank).  [The Rockefellers set up the National Broadcasting Company.  Today NBC is owner of Comcast Cable.]
            Thomas Jefferson issued this warning:  “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
            Today, less than 2% of Americans own their homes.  [What is the percentage in 2017?]
            The Fed, like other central banks, uses a system called “fractional banking”.  Deposits become the “fraction”, allowing the system to “create” as much as 770% of that deposit:  i.e. a $1,000 deposit becomes approximately $7,700, a $10,000 deposit becomes approximately $77,000.
            In addition, examine the “amount due” on your property tax statement.  You will not find a dollar sign affixed to that “amount”.  Why?  The Coinage Act of 1792, which has never been revoked, defines a dollar as 412.5 grains of 9/10 fine silver or 25.8 grains of 9/10 fine gold.  Federal Reserve Notes are not redeemable in silver nor gold.  To affix a dollar sign to the “amount due” would be fraudulent.
            Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 says that only Congress has the power to “…coin money, regulate the value thereof…and fix the standard of weights and measures.”  Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 says that “No state shall…make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts…”  The Federal Reserve operates in violation of the Constitution.
            Since Col. House [communist Insider] helped establish the Federal Reserve Act, and believed in socialism [communism], is the central bank concept Marxist?  [You bet it is!]  Plank 5 of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto [which he legally (had permission to copy) pirated from an earlier version by an Insider] reads:  “Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital, and an exclusive monopoly.”  (Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx [a lie in and of itself]; available at General Birch Services, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913-8040).
            House also knew that a “heavy or progressive[6] graduated income tax” (plank no. 2) had to be established along with the central bank.  Legislation was needed to ensure repayment of anticipated government borrowing.  On June 29, 1909, Senator Nelson W. Aldrich (maternal grandfather to the Rockefeller brothers) introduced the Corporation Excise Tax Act of 1909.  This was concurrent with his participation of the Federal Reserve Act planning.  This Act saddled competitors with Big Business with an excise tax on income (profits), but provided the conspirators a loophole:  tax-exempt foundations [like the Clinton Foundation].  By the time the 16th Amendment and the Federal Reserve Act was passed (in 1913), the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations were under way.  Through financial influence and brilliant deception, the conspirators had established the mechanisms to:

1)  run up the debt;
2)  collect the debt;
3)  and for themselves, avoid the taxes necessary to pay the interest on the debt.

            The pillage of America began in earnest during the Depression.  The Fed deflated (contracted) the money supply, forcing thousands into bankruptcy and foreclosure.  The following was intended for leading financiers only, and appeared in the Civil Servants’ Year Book.  “The Organizer”, Jan. 1934:  “Capital must protect itself in every way…Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible.  When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of leading financiers.  People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.  This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world.”
            Plank no. 1 of the Communist Manifesto is “abolition of private property”.
            The conspirators knew that the American people had to somehow be convinced into paying for the government borrowing that began during the Depression.  Their opportunity came during W.W.II with the Victory Tax Act of 1942 (56 Stat. Ch. 619, pg. 884; October 21, 1942).  This was a voluntary and temporary measure to help finance the war effort.  [By the way Insider F.D.R. purposely allowed Pearl Harbor to be bombed on December 7, 1943.  No wonder he said that this date would “live in infamy”!  It was his evil act (infamy) that got us into World War II!]  Why was it voluntary?  Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the Constitution forbids direct taxation unless apportioned.  Apportionment means to divide equally among the population (census).  The last time direct taxes were laid upon the American people by apportionment was during the Civil War.
            The Victory Tax Act of 1942 was repealed on May 29, 1944 (58 Stat, Ch. 210, pg. 234).  With American patriotism high and D-Day a week away, who would notice that this voluntary unapportioned direct tax had been repealed?  The clauses of the Constitution regarding direct taxation are still law.  The 16th Amendment gave Congress “no new powers of taxation”  (Stanton vs. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103).  The “…incomes…without apportionment…” in the 16th Amendment places it in the category of an indirect (excise) tax (Brushaber vs. Union Pacific RR Co., 240 U.S. 1).  Simply stated, it is a profits tax.
            How would the government operate without personal income tax revenue?  With imposts, duties, and excises (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1).  Can you see why NAFTA and GATT is promoted?  The 1984 Grace Commission, Report to the President, pg. 4 reveals where personal income taxes go:  “100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Dept and by Federal transfer payments.  In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from their government.”  [What a rotten way to run any business!]
            Today, three quarters of the Federal budget is unconstitutional, according to Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 2-18.  Why do our elected representatives allow this?  Remember, the third item on Col. House’s agenda was to control both political parties of the United States.  [I would say he accomplished his communist agenda!]
            Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time (1966, The MacMillan Co., New York; available from Angriff Press, Box 2726, Hollywood, California 90028) was written by Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley.  It was intended as a text for aspiring globalists [communists, progressives], and gives a 1,300 page account of the history, mechanisms, and goals through which a ruling financial dynasty would control a global economy.  On page 52, the author writes that the international bankers were:  “…devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.”
            There are two organizations formed by and intimately associated with the international bankers:

1)  the Council of Foreign Relations[7];
2)  the Tri-Lateral Commission.

            Let’s examine briefly their background and their stated goals.
            Because America refused to join the League of Nations [what later became the United Nations] following W.W.I, representatives from the American financial dynasties met with their British counterparts in Paris on May 19, 1919.  The American contingent was led by Col. House and became known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) [which both President Clinton and Hillary Clinton are members of].  It was founded on July 29, 1921, backed by Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundation money.  It included many of the same people who established the Federal Reserve.  Its quarterly journal, Foreign Affairs, has called for world government as far back as December 1922.
            [What was going on in Boston at this time?  There was a battle between the publishing Trustees and the illegal five-member Board of Directors.  “The Master handed down his decision on March 6, 1920, in favor of the Trustees of the Publishing Society.  The Directors immediately filed their own Bill in Equity on April 14, 1920, appealing to the Full Bench of the Massachusetts Supreme Court for a reversal of the Master’s decision.”[8]
            “The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts handed down its final decision on November 21, 1921.  Hugh A. Studdert-Kennedy described it this way: “‘The Supreme Court of Massachusetts upheld the Master’s findings of fact in every particular, that the Trustees had been faithful to their trust and that they had managed it honestly, successfully, and disinterestedly.  The court, however, was inclined to admit this other law to which the Directors and their supporters had appealed, this ecclesiastical law {of the red dragon} which in this case they were inclined to agree might be regarded as paramount to the law of the land.  At any rate, it was an ecclesiastical matter and it was not for the Court to sit in judgment on ecclesiastical matters.  {What does this mean?  It means that the Church Manual was thrown down into the dust of mortal mind, Adamic law.}
            “‘The Court, therefore, would wash its hands {like Pilot} of the whole question by declaring that final power of removal [of Publishing Society trustees] did rest with the Board of Directors, that the Directors were the supreme authority in the Christian Science organization {just like the Jewish priests were the authorities over the Jewish organization}, any Deed of Trust or provisions to the contrary notwithstanding.’[9][10]
            “The Publishing Society Trustees resigned their offices to the court, and the latter appointed replacements acceptable and subservient to the Board of Directors.  In this way, the Publishing Society was totally dominated by the Directors, and Mrs. Eddy’s Deed of Trust of 1893, for all intents and purposes, became a nullity.”[11]
            So with the Board of Directors illegally (even though they did it legally in the mortal minded court system) taking charge of the Publishing Society Trustees one can begin to understand how the international bankers were taking over the government of the United States of America through the President, the Congress, the Senate, and the court system.]
            CFR member James Warburg (whose father Paul Warburg merged his Manhattan Bank with Rockefeller’s Chase Bank), a former aide to FDR, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this on Feb. 17, 1950:  “You shall have world government, whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”
            On Nov. 25th, 1959, the CFR published Study No. 7, which describes their goal:  “…building a new international order (which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace (and) for social and economic change…an international order…including states labeling themselves as Socialist [communist].”
            In the 50th anniversary issue of Foreign Affairs, a leading article was written by CFR member Kingman Brewster, Jr., entitled “Reflections on Our National Purpose”.  In this article, he stated that our national purpose should be to abolish our nationality.
            In a 1974 article in Foreign Affairs, entitled “The Hard Road to World Order”, CFR member Richard Gardner wrote that the house of world order would have to be built through:  “…an end run around our national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.”  [Do you now understand why mainstream media press speak so irately against President Trump and his “nationalism”?]
            As of June 1992, the CFR has 2905 members in the United States (1992 Annual Report, the Council of Foreign Relations, the Harold Pratt House, 58 E 68th St., New York, New York 10021).
            David Rockefeller (grandson of John D. Rockefeller), who has also been a director of the CFR since 1949, formed the Tri Lateral Commission (the second organization) in 1973.  The Tri Lat was the brainchild of Columbia University professor Zbigniew Bzrezinski, who, in his book Between Two Ages, advocated an economic alliance among the western industrialized nations.
            Rockefeller hired Bzrezinski, made him the executive director, and established a tri-lateral alliance encompassing Japan, North America, and Western Europe.  Its first meeting was held in Tokyo Oct. 21, 1973.
            In Bzrezinski’s book, the author states:

1)  America is in obsolescence (page 198);
2)  he advocates central (Marxist) planning (page 260);
3)  he wants to develop limitations on sovereignty (page 296);
4)  he finally states his goal:  a world government (page 308 of his 309 page book)

            Henry Kissinger [boo] is one of the most powerful and influential members of the Tri Lat (also CFR).  Columnist Paul Scott interviewed him.  He said that it is Kissinger’s belief that by controlling energy, especially oil, one can control nations and their financial systems.  By placing food, oil, and the world’s monetary system under international control, Kissinger is convinced that a world government can become a reality.  [This is why I was worried when President-elect Trump met with Henry Kissinger.]
            As of April 1992, the Tri Lateral Commission has 320 members divided among Japan, North America, and Western Europe.  (Tri Lateral Commission, 345 E. 46th St., New York, New York 10017).
            The Tri Lat’s goal is a world government, the same as that of the CFR.  The first 35 members of the Tri Lat were also members of the CFR.  They both have as members some of the most elite names in finance, industry, media, labor, academic circles, and government.  Their rosters read like a who’s who in these areas.
            What is the difference between the CFR and the Tri Lat?  The CFR has been around since 1921, the Tri Lat, since 1973.  The only difference is the fact that the Tri Lat is an elite group, who has been chosen to speed up the process of a one-world government through control of food, energy, and an international monetary system [as found in Europe with its Euro].
            Let’s examine the CFR and Tri Lat influence in government.
            CFR control in government actually began in earnest in 1939 by establishing within United States State Department a “Committee on Post-War Problems”, the group (staffed and funded by the CFR) which designed the United Nations (the story of which is contained in State Department Publication 2349, “Report To The President On the Results of the San Francisco Conference”).
            Since W.W.II, the CFR has filled key positions in virtually every administration.  Furthermore, since Eisenhower, every man who has won the nomination for either party (except Goldwater in 1964 and Reagan in 1980) has been a member of the CFR:

            An important point must be stressed:  By controlling the candidates we vote for, the CFR is assured their goal of world government.  Why?  Because CFR Presidents fill key positions with CFR members by appointment (list of 110 Nixon appointments can be found in None Dare Call it Conspiracy, by Gary Allen, 1972, available from General Birch Services, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913).
            Since 1973, Tri Lat members have also filled key positions.  One of the first members of the Tri Lat was Jimmy Carter, whose administration had 19 Tri Lateralists including:

1)  Vice President Mondale
2)  Secretary of State Vance
3)  Secretary of the Treasury Blumenthal
4)  Secretary of Defense Brown
5)  National Security Advisor Bzrezinski

            These five positions made up the National Security Council, and were held by members of an organization that advocates world government.  Was their oath of office to uphold the Constitution a mere formality?  Others included:

1)  nearly all of the undersecretaries of State;
2)  nearly all of the undersecretaries of Treasury;
3)  the Panama Canal Treaty negotiator;
4)  the Salt Treaty negotiator;
5)  the Ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young;
6)  the Ambassador to Italy, Richard Gardner (remember, the Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy are top stockholders in the Fed. and Gardner advocated an “…end run around our national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.”)

            An article about Bzrezinski (Carter’s National Security Advisor, executive director of the Tri Lat. and author of Between Two Ages) and Carter appeared in the March 21, 1978 New York Times:  “The two men met for the first time about four years ago, when Mr. Bzrezinski was the executive director of the Tri Lateral Commission, and had the foresight to ask the then obscure governor of Georgia to join its ranks.  Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the campaign and appears to have grown closer still.”
            Bzrezinski (teacher) praises Marxism, thinks the United States is in obsolescence, and advocates a world government; the student was the President of the United States!
            Another article, written by CFR past president Winston Lord, appeared in the August 4-11, 1978 issue of W magazine.  He boasted:  “The Tri Lateral Commission doesn’t secretly run the world, the Council of Foreign Relations does that.”
            Winston Lord is currently the Assistant Secretary for East Asian/Pacific Affairs (State Department) and special envoy to Red China [communists].  Contrary to candidate Clinton’s “stand” on human rights, President Clinton has recently granted Red China an unconditional MFN trade status with the United States; even though over 10,000 Chinese dissidents have been murdered since Tianemen Square.  [Let us not forget the deal Clinton made with North Korea!]
            The CFR domination of just and last three Administrations reveals:

1)  347 members under Reagan;
2)  382 members under Bush;
3)  387 members under Clinton (over 1 in 8 of their total membership).

            The following CFR members hold top positions in our current Administration:

1)  President Bill Clinton;
2)  Vice President Al Gore [Global Warming fanatic];
3)  Secretary of State Warren Christopher;
4)  Deputy Secretary of State Clifton R. Wharton;
5)  CIA Director R. James Woolsey;
6)  National Security Advisor W. Anthony Lake;
7)  Deputy National Security Advisor Samuel R. Berger;
8)  Secretary of Defense Les Aspen;
9)  Chairman of Intelligence Advisory Board William J. Crowe;
10)  United Nations Ambassador Madeleine Albright;
11)  Secretary Health and Human Services Donna E. Shalala;
12)  OMB Alice M. Rivlin;
13)  Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Henry G. Cisneros;
14)  Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors Laura D. Tyson;
15)  Secretary of the Treasury Lloyd M. Bentsen (former CFR);
16)  Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt;
17)  Supreme Court Justices:  Ruth Bader Ginsberg [still in office], Sandra Day O’Conner, and the most recent appointee Stephen G. Breyer (3 of 9 Justices are CFR members).

            Have you ever wondered why, since W.W.II, U.S. foreign policy has allowed communist expansion?  Consider the roles of the following CFR members since W.W.II:

1)  George Marshall and Dean Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang Kai-shek, allowing communist takeover of China;

2)  Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged the no-win undeclared war in Korea and the removal of General McArthur;

3)  John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, under CFR President Eisenhower betrayed Hungarian freedom fighters and knowingly brought Fidel Castro to power in Cuba;

4)  McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy saw to it that the Bay of Pigs invasion to oust Castro failed;

5)  Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge pushed the United States into Vietnam – and then drew up the rules making victory impossible [also the Insider international bankers supplied the Vietnamese enemies with their weapons];

6)  Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued these policies, which led to communist takeover of South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos;

7)  Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz arranged for the Panama Canal giveaway – and gave $400 million dollars to that Marxist dictatorship to take it;

8)  Under leadership of Zbigniew Bzrezinski, Cyrus Vance, and Warren Christopher, the Carter Administration undermined U.S. allies in Iran and Nicaragua;

9)  Under Reagan, George Schultz, William J. Casey, and Malcom Baldridge arranged U.S. foreign aid to communist Romania, communist Poland, and the USSR; they also impeded anti-Communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua.

            Why?  It is easier to control oppressive Marxist regimes than nations of free men – in a one-world socialist government.  [This also helps explain why the Uranium One Deal was lied about, the truth hidden and the deal was manipulated.  The Clintons (who got loads of money from the Russians) and the Obama administration wanted this deal to go through because they LOVE communists, as they ARE communists!  Let us stop beating around the Bushes!  They ALL ARE COMMUNISTS!!!  Let us begin to admit it!!!]
            Yes, Col. House’s [communist] agenda of controlling both political parties in the United States has been achieved, through, as Madison warned, “silent and gradual encroachment” [this is why it is called Progressivism].  An excellent history of the CFR is found in The Shadows of Power (James Perloff, 1988, Western Island Publishers, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913, 1-414-749-3783).
            Just as Col. House led an American contingent to Paris in 1919, there are also powerful likeminded organizations in Europe, through financial control, promoting a one-world government.  The most prominent of these is the Bilderbergers[15] (est. in 1954), and is largely responsible for the unification of Europe through the Treaty of Rome (1957).
            [[“In September 1954, all branch churches in the United States were sent a copy of the “Williams Intelligence Summary” written by Robert H. Williams who listed himself as a ‘former Counter Intelligence officer.’  One article entitled ‘Canham Seduces Monitor’ gives the flavor of the times and the intensity of the feelings:

            “‘It is not by preference that I report the betrayal, for instance, of the intensely loyal Christian Scientists who cherish American ideals and traditions, by the editor and some staff member of the Christian Science Monitor… Hundreds of members of that church have written protest letters to Erwin D. Canham {communist editor of The Christian Science Monitor}, but leftwingers {Insiders} hang on so tenaciously as to make us wonder if one of the rich and arrogant secretive organizations of revolution privately eggs them on… Erwin Canham was a Rhodes Scholar {like William Clinton} and is an active member of the Association of American Rhodes Scholars {of the Round Table, the English CFR}… Not every Rhodes Scholar has remained permanently indoctrinated with international Socialism {communism} otherwise known as Marxism; but the exceptions seem to be remarkably few and Canham is not one of them.  One of his fellow Rhodes Scholars Clarence Kirshman Streit, founded Union Now, which would hoist a flag above Old Glory and set aside our Constitutional government, which means our national independence and personal freedom.  Canham’s editorials and featured articles reveal a kinship with Streit…
            “‘Another Soviet apologist, featured by Canham is Vera Micheles Dean.  Starting November 14, 1950, the Monitor, carried a series of eight articles by her… Canham cannot argue that he didn’t know the gun was loaded, for Miss Dean was listed two years before, in the 1948 California Un-American Activities Report, as one of the authors recommended to American teachers by the Communist front National Council of American Soviet Friendship.  In the same official report (1948) she was listed as one of the signers of the Golden Book of American Friendship with the Soviet Union.  The Un-American Activities Committee report said these signers “may be said to have met the acid test for admiration of a totalitarian dictatorship”…
            “‘You who have tirelessly written Mr. Canham {Mr. Cain-Ham} trying to show him wherein he was wrong, have not made a dent on him…’ {Because he is a communist and not a Christian Scientist!}
            “Branch churches which wrote to Boston to report receiving the Williams newsletter were assured by the Directors that the charges had no basis in fact and that all future unsolicited mail on the subject should be disregarded.”[16]
            Yet the fix was in on The Monitor ever since May 1, 1917, when the line “An International Daily Newspaper” was added on The Monitor’s masthead.  International means “communist”.  “In November 19 1956, the ‘Committee of 1,000 Christian Scientists’ was formed with R. Roy Pursell of Plymouth, Michigan, as Executive Secretary.  {I take comfort that there were some Christian Scientists who were awake to what was really going on in the Church.}  The committee put out a newsletter, The Searchlight, which was dedicated to defend The Christian Science Monitor.  According to their literature:  {Christian} ‘Scientists who realized the danger of Internationalism submerging the American people to a minority if any World [government] group (we are but 8% of the [world] population) have been deeply concerned.  Many objected to the term “An International Daily Newspaper” but succeeded only in getting it reduced in size…’”[17]

            It was in 1957 that the cover of the Sentinel was drastically changed.  The removal of “one of the two woman {Sentinels} was removed and the classical, architectural motif was abandoned.”[18]
            Regardless of where these groups are from, their goal is a world government, and United Nations, which they established, is the platform from which it will be launched.
            [Communist Insiders infiltrated The Christian Science Monitor, as well as, the Board of Directors.  Mary Baker Eddy’s newspaper was formed to harm no man – yet today this paper supports one world order agenda, as well as, the United Nations.  CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS WAKE UP!]
            Global Tyranny…Step by Step (by William Jasper, 1992, Western Islands Publishers, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913) gives a well-documented examination of the past, present, and future role of the United Nations in the emerging New World Order.  The titles of a few of its chapters:

Chapter 1:  “The New World Army”;
Chapter 3:  “The U.N. Founders”;
Chapter 5:  “The Drive for World Government”;
Chapter 8:  “The U.N. Grab for Your Child” [via public education and college?];
Chapter 10:  “The New World Money System”.

            The author also presents ways we can reverse this encroachment against our liberty and freedom.
            The Rockefellers play a key role in America’s financial and political life.  Currently, David Rockefeller is the honorary chairman of both the CFR and the Tri Lateral Commission, as well as (through his Chase Manhattan bank) a top stockholder in the Federal Reserve.
            The Rockefeller influence goes back to 1890, when John D. Rockefeller was refining nearly 90% of all crude oil in the country, and frequently worked in concert with Wall Street banker J.P. Morgan.  By the turn of the century, John D. purchased the Chase Bank and brother William brought the National City Bank of New York, and in 1913, became part of the Federal Reserve System.  The Rockefeller Foundation was also in full operation by that time; effectively nullifying the “tax on the wealthy” as the proponents of 16th Amendment had sought.
            According to the Sept. 16, 1916 New York Times, the Rockefeller oil holdings alone were worth $500 million.  By 1930, the 200 largest corporations, under Rockefeller and Morgan influence, held over 49% of the assets of all 40,000 corporations in the country.  AT&T (controlled by Morgan) had greater assets than the total wealth in 21 states.
            The influence of the Rockefeller and Morgan groups was so great they could affect the economic life of the country to a large degree and almost control its political life on the Federal level.
            The Rockefellers increased their leverage over the economy throughout the Depression Years:

1)  many of their competitors were hard-hit by the Stock Market Crash;
2)  and, being a part of the Fed, the Rockefellers benefited from massive government borrowing;
3)  which, in turn, furthered their control of industry, soon to be mobilized for war production.

            America’s [planned and manipulated] entry into W.W. II enhanced all of the above, and their wealth continued to be funneled into the tax-exempt foundations.
            Following the War, the United States was in such bad economic condition, that in 1950, it declared bankruptcy a second time and the Secretary of treasury was appointed as “Receiver” in the bankruptcy (Reorganization Plan No. 26, Title 5 U.S.C.A.  903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, page 5967).
            In 1953, Congressman Carroll Reese of Tennessee initiated a Congressional Committee to investigate the tremendous influence of the huge tax-exempt foundations and their control over the economy.  Yet, even Congress had little influence in diminishing the tremendous influence and control the international bankers exercised in the economy.  The Rockefeller’s wealth continued to expand through the use of their tax-exempt foundations.
            Each year the Rockefellers can dump up to half of their income into their foundations and deduct these donations from their income tax.  Nelson Rockefeller admitted at his confirmation hearings (for VP):  “The foundation pays no capital gains tax and no income tax, so those funds can continue to multiply.”
            And indeed they have.  The following information on the Rockefeller’s more current wealth is derived from Congressman Patman’s Report in the Congressional Record.  Consider their direct ownership of stock and pay particular attention to the oil companies.
            In direct stock, they own:  Exxon – 156.7 million; Rockefeller Center – 98 million; Standard of California – 85 million; IBM – 72.6 million; Chase Manhattan Bank – 18 million.  Others that they have 10 million or more in are:  Mobil Oil, Eastman Kodak, General Electric, Texas Instruments, Minnesota Mining & Mfg., and they own significant portions of about 50 other major American companies.
            A look at their security holdings reveals:  they control Chase Manhattan Bank, City National Bank of New York, and Chemical Bank, among others; these are in the top of the list.  The Chase Manhattan Bank deals in many foreign countries as well as corporations:  well over 100 countries with about 50,000 affiliated banks.
            A look at the interlocking boards of directors in the insurance industry, at the time this data was compiled, revealed that the Rockefellers controlled 3 of the 4 largest insurance companies in the world, that being Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, and New York Life.  The assets of these three at that time was $113 billion.  They control others as well.
            Just to summarize the banks and insurance companies, this amounts to 25% of all the assets of the 50 largest banks, and 30% of the assets of the 50 largest life insurance companies.  This gives them leverage over the economy that goes far beyond direct ownership.
            Congressman Patman also found that controlling 5% or more of the stock in a corporation, whose stock is widely held, essentially yields minority control.  Considering those corporations that the Rockefeller family has 10% control, or 5%, and at least two members of their board of directors, reveals the following:  Exxon, Mobil Oil, Standard of California, Standard of Indiana, International Harvester, Inland Steel, Marathon Oil, Quaker Oats, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel, Freeport Sulfur, and International Basic Economy Corporation.  Corporations which are probably under Rockefeller influence, and probably because it is extremely difficult to trace stock ownership through trusts and foundations, are these:  Texaco, IT&T, Westinghouse, Boeing, International Paper, Sperry Rand, Xerox, National Cash Register, National Steel, American Home Products, Pfizer, Avon, and Merck.
            Merck has just agreed to buy Medco Containment, the nation’s largest marketer of discount prescription medicines.  The acquisition makes Merck, by far, the largest integrated producer and distributor of pharmaceuticals in the country (Wall Street Journal, 7-29-93).  [This makes me wonder if the prescription drug epidemic taking place today in the U.S.A. is not a part of the Insider’s agenda?]
            Transportation companies under the Rockefeller influence include Penn Central, TWA, Eastern Airlines, United Airlines, National Airlines, Delta, Braniff, and Consolidated Freightways.
            Others they control through interlocking boards of directors are:  Allied Chemical, Anaconda Copper, DuPont, Monsanto, Olin-Mathison, Borden, National Distillers, Shell, Gulf, Union Oil, Dow, Celanese, Pittsburgh Plate Glass, Cities Service, Stauffer Chemical, Continental Oil, Union Carbide, American Cyanmid, American Motors, Bendix, and Chrysler.  Isn’t that odd?  Who are the biggest stockholders in Chrysler and you had to bail them out?  Others are CIT Financial.  SS Kresge and RH Macy.
            To summarize the foregoing:  37 of the top 100 industrials, 9 of the top 20 transportation firms, the nation’s No. 1 utility, three of the top four insurance companies, plus scores of smaller companies engaged in manufacturing, distribution, retail sales, loans or investments.  These are just the known figures.  So can you start to see the economic power the Rockefeller family has?  Now, in addition to this, recognize the power they have through membership in the Tri Lateral Commission and the CFR through other heads of multi-national corporations.
            There were published several reports under the Senate Investigating Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting, and Management.  They are under the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, January 1978.  The first report is entitled Interlocking Boards of Directors Among Major U. S. Corporations.  This Senate study looked at the top 130 corporations and placed every name of every board of directors into a computer and found this:  70% of the tope 130 corporations are interlocked directly or indirectly with the lower companies.  They even found many competing companies and corporations have the same board of directors and several members of the same board of directors, which is illegal according to Section 8 of the Clayton Act.  When this point is reached, you do not have competition anymore, you have price-fixing.  Some of these people were sitting on 16 different boards of directors!  In the April 1993 IBM proxy statement, this can be demonstrated.  Also, 8 of these 18 directors are CFR (IBM Notice of 1993 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement; IBM, Armonk, New York 10504).
            The second report the same committee did was called Voting Rights – Major U. S. Corporations.  They looked at 122 corporations and found this:  One corporation, Morgan Guaranty and Trust, was in the top five vote-holders of 57 of those corporations; another, City National Bank of New York, was in the top five vote-holders of 36 of those.  That’s 93 of the top 122 corporations.  Now, who was the top vote-holder in the parent company of Morgan Guaranty and Trust?  Number one was City National Bank of New York, and number two was the Chase Manhattan Bank, which means that the Rockefellers controlled Morgan Guaranty and Trust and also the City National Bank of New York.  The Rockefellers are in the top five vote-holders in 93 of those 122 corporations.  This is what the Subcommittee found in 1978.  Why didn’t we hear about it?  At that time, half of the members of the Senate Subcommittee over this study were CFR/Tri Lat.
            There shouldn’t be much doubt who controls the oil here.  But what about the Middle East oil?  Now, supposedly, OPEC has nationalized, in most cases, the oil fields over there.  Aramco, an oil consortium of Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, and SOCAL got 42 cents on every petrodollar and OPEC 58 cents during the late 70’s “energy crisis”.  Do you think it bothered them that the price of gas doubled while the media was telling us there was an oil shortage?  [No.  By the way, during this “so-called” gas shortage my family happened to take a vacation traveling through Texas.  They were having gas wars!  The gas was cheap in Texas.]
            The Tri Lat “engineered” the crisis.  Its planning publication is called the Triangle Papers.  On page 73 of Publication No. 17, entitled Energy:  Managing the Transition (1978), we find this:  “We therefore urge each Tri Lateral government to review its tax structure and develop specific energy taxes.  An obvious example here is a higher federal excise tax on gasoline in the United States.”
            In other words, they created the crisis, and we paid for it at the pumps through higher prices and higher taxes.  Who was blamed?  OPEC.  [The price for gasoline has never gone back down either.]
            The same people who control the oil here exercise control in the Middle East.  According to the 1974 report of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations, the Aramco consortium attempted to block America’s emergency airlift to Israel, during the Yom Kippur War of 1973.  These companies cooperated closely with Saudi Arabia to deny oil and fuel to the United States Navy.  In the 1930’s, it was Standard Oil (Rockefeller) money that established the oil industry over there.  This raises questions about the real motive of Desert Storm.
            Remember, it is Kissinger’s belief that a world government can be brought about by controlling an international monetary system, oil/energy, and food.  Consider how far the control of food has gotten:  In the seventies, Senator Gannon ran a study in five counties of Kansas.  He found that 85,000 acres over the 5,000 acre legal limit were illegally owned by large multinational corporations.  The American Agriculture paper also reported that six coal companies, who were in turn controlled by the oil companies, owned somewhere in the neighborhood of 80% of the farm land in Illinois.  These are just a few examples.  [Today they are bioengineering our crops!]
            Remember, in 1973, the Tri Lateral Commission was formed, and in 1973 the large multinational corporations started diversifying.  Into what?  Food.
            Through interlocking directors, at the time of this study,

1)  Gulf was interlocked with General Foods and Ralston Purina;
2)  Mobil Oil with General Foods and H. J. Heinz;
3)  Standard of California with American Potato, Basic Vegetable Products, and Broadway Hale Stores;
4)  Atlantic Richfield Co. with Lincoln County Livestock, and Diamond A Cattle;
5)  Philips Petroleum with Campbell Soup;
6)  Citgo with Kraft and Campbell Soup;
7)  Getty Oil with A&P and Carnation;
8)  Standard Oil of Ohio with National Biscuit;
9)  Hesslup with Borden;
10)  IT&T with Wonderbread;
11)  Safeway is controlled by the Chase Manhattan Bank.

            In addition, Tenneco controlled, at the time of this report, approximately one and a half million acres of land, gas, oil, and chemicals.  Case (farm implements) and International Harvester are controlled by the Rockefellers and John Deere’s president, at that time, a member of the Tri Lateral Commission.  Who was the biggest beef producer through feedlots and fatteners?  Greyhound bus.  Who was the biggest pork producer in the world?  Armor, owned by Greyhound Bus.  One of the largest cattle feeders by volume in the United States as well as one of the largest grain companies is Cargill, (run by Whitney McMillan, Tri Lat member), and they bought Missouri Beef, one of the largest beef packing plants.
            [[What was going on in Christian Science during 1973?  “The final days of the Carpenter Foundation came in 1973.  Because all of its operating funds had been exhausted in legal action against Richard Oakes between 1965 and 1971, the trustees were now ready to turn over the Carpenters’ collection to The Mother Church.  Reginald Kerry[19] of Santa Barbara, California, was instrumental in carrying out the negotiations.  The agreement included that The Mother Church would promise to make the Carpenter’s collection ‘ever accessible to qualified students throughout the world.’  Immediately after signing the agreement, trucks were sent from Boston to take the priceless collection to the Archives of The Mother Church.  The property and furnishings at the Carpenter Foundation were sold.  The Carpenters’ large Victorian mansion, which Gilbert Carpenter, Sr. had noted was built in 1866, was leveled very soon thereafter.
            “The Mother Church Archives refused to make the Carpenter Material available to students of Christian Science as promised in the agreement.[20]  The reason given was that there were inaccuracies and discrepancies in some of the books.  As those familiar with the situation were aware, the Carpenters sent a copy of every book to the Mother Church Archives at the time they were published.  Therefore, the Directors and the Archivist knew what the books contained before signing the agreement.  The excuse that the books contained inaccuracies or discrepancies was disingenuous and dishonest.  {I will tell you later on the main reason why the Carpenter Material was made unavailable.}
            “The Journals for 1973 contained a number of important items.  In January, the Directors stated that the final construction phase had begun at the new Church Center which now was to include the addition of a portico[21] to the St. Paul Street facade of the Extension:  ‘This portico helps fulfill the original architectural concept of the church Extension.  The portico is placed where the main entrance was originally meant to be, and it will provide easier and more gracious access to the church auditorium.’[22]  The architect’s model of the Extension at the time of its construction between 1904 and 1906 did not show any features which were not actually constructed.[23]  The model of the proposed Church Center pictured in the June 6, 1966, Christian Science Monitor shows a proposed arched entrance which was very different from the portico now contemplated.  The February Journal included:  ‘The Mother Church reviews bylaws of a potential church before recognizing it as a branch.  Whenever these bylaws are revised substantially, the Branches Division welcomes the opportunity to review them again.  Feel free to write for a copy of the newly revised “Guidelines for Bylaws.”’  The April issue reported more visits by the Directors to the British Isles and Latin America.  The same issue announces a new cover design for the Sentinel beginning on April 7th.  The lady with the lamp[24] would be removed from inside the front cover {moved sometime after 1957} where it had been relegated.  The notice admitted that Mrs. Eddy removed the cross and crown seal from the cover, but that did not mean that she meant that it should never be put there.[25]  The June issue stated that two of Mrs. Eddy’s hymns had been included in the new U.S. Air Force Hymnal.  The August issue stated, ‘For the first time in the history of our church, members of the Christian Science Board of Directors are making tours to all parts of the world where Christian Science is practiced…These trips are intended to strengthen the unity of the Field with The Mother Church, and to enable the visiting Directors to learn firsthand of the opportunities in distant parts of the world to vitalize the healing thrust of our movement.’…”[26]
            Did the Christian Science Field even object to the disappearance of both ladies with lamps?  I do not think so.  I ask “why not?”

            What was Mary Baker Eddy’s purpose in placing two women Sentinels on the cover of her periodical?  Just as important to understand, what was the reason for the board of directors’ deletion of the two women Sentinels?
            I know it had to do with Mary Baker Eddy’s place in Bible prophecy.  In Andrew W. Hartsook’s THE BANNER – Volume Nine – Number One – Fall 1995 he writes:


            Miscellaneous Documents Relating to Christian Science is a book published in 1961 by the Carpenter Foundation.  One chapter in that book is entitled “Christian Science Notes” by Caroline D. Noyes, C.S.D.  Mrs. Noyes attended classes taught by Mrs. Eddy in 1884, 1885, and 1887.  In her notes she writes, ‘One distinguishing feature in Mrs. Eddy’s students and loyal followers or of her faithful Normal teachers, they always recognized and have always done so, the fact that Mrs. Eddy was the woman St. John prophesies of in Revelation XII and the little book spoken of in a previous chapter {Revelation 10} is Science and Health… In so believing, they recognize the only true Leader in Mrs. Eddy {not a board of directors}, the Revelator, the Discoverer and Founder of the Christ, Truth that is saving the world.  They consider it an altogether sacred book as prophesied by St. John and feel confident by the results of their work in casting out error and healing it is the word of God and will save all who trust to it, and see in it a continuation and confirmation of Jesus’ teaching.
            “‘The great red dragon alluded to in the twelfth chapter typifies the mental malpractice or malicious animal magnetism directed against Mrs. Eddy’s works and students and herself and explains something of the difficulties which she and they had to overcome.  It has always been the greatest enemy of Christian Science and still is and we can say it is the only enemy of Christian Science.  We, her loyal students, thoroughly endorse her teachings on that subject and could have made no headway or success had we not done so.’[27]

            “In a transcript recently published by The Bookmark entitled, Mrs. Eddy’s Explanation of the Illustrated Poem ‘Christ and Christmas’ as {presumably} given by Judge Septimus J. Hanna, the following statements are made:
            “‘[Mrs. {Mary Baker Glover} Eddy] stated, “The true Science – divine Science – will be lost sight of again unless we arouse ourselves.  This demonstrating to make matter build up is not Science.  The building up of churches, the writing of articles and the speaking in public is the old way of building up a cause.  The way I brought this Cause {not Movement} into sight was through HEALING:  and now these other things would come in and hide it just as was done in the time of Jesus.  Now this Cause {not Movement} must be saved and I pray God to be spared for this work.”’ (p. 25, 26)
            “‘Mrs. Eddy tells us that the enemy attempts to sever her from her revelation more than they attempt anything else.  All claims of malicious animal magnetism are handled when resistance to her place in Bible prophecy is handled… If we handle the world’s hatred of her {as well as, today, the fact that a big majority of people do not even know who she is}, that love will come forth abundantly in our healing work.’ (p. 26)
            “‘Mrs. Eddy wrote, “I am amazed when I see how little Christian Science healing is done.  So much is faith healing, little more.”  And again, “Unless we have better healers and more of this work than any other is done, our Cause will not stand and having done all stand Demonstration is the whole of Christian Science, nothing else proves it, nothing else will save it and continue it with us.  God has said this and Christ Jesus has proved it.”’ (p. 29, 30)
            “‘The following is recorded in the handwriting of Laura Sargent.  “In order to love God, we must honor and love the Way.  How can we love God unless we love His idea which shows us the way and which is the Way; and in order to honor and love the Way, we must have a true sense of the individual through whom the Way has been manifested to us, else we are not keeping the law to love our neighbor as ourself, or doing by our neighbor as we would be done by… Our whole salvation rests upon the manner in which we treat her, since the Way comes to us through her, and God demands that we love our neighbor by having the spiritual sense of our neighbor, and the spiritual sense of our Teacher and Mother as God’s idea that we must love and honor.”’ (p. 48, 49)”
            Are the two Sentinels that are supposed to be FOREVER on the cover of the Sentinel representations of Mary Baker Eddy – Teacher and Mother as God’s idea?  I originally wanted to title this website as Mother’s Hood, but I was not able to do so.  I think that I am Mother Hood because of a vision dream I had in 2011.  But is not the fact that I publish Mary Baker Eddy’s Teaching (in part), and present it to you, not also mean that my website is also Mary Baker Eddy’s Mother Hood?  Is not her successor (generic man) depicted as a young girl in Illustration 7 of Christ and Christmas?

First Edition

            There are only two women in toga-style dresses in Christ and Christmas.  Are not these two women representations of the two Sentinels?  The first woman is for sure a depiction of Mary Baker Eddy; she holds the scroll of “Christian Science” and stands by Jesus’ side (who is sitting as a blade).

First Edition

            We see her left foot.  While in the following Illustration (#10) we see the second woman Sentinel and her right foot.  Is the young girl (who has imbrased her own manhood) looking out the window and seeing the woman Sentinel the same girl depicted in SUFFER THE CHILDREN TO COME UNTO ME?

Truth versus Error

            She too holds a scroll.  In the earlier editions the scroll was easy to read.  It had the word “TRUTH” on it (seen directly below).  In later editions (as seen directly above) the word is harder to make out.  Are not these two scrolls the two lamps of the two ladies?

First Edition

            Mary Baker Eddy speaks of the woman’s two feet (that stand upon the moon) in two separate places in the chapter “The Apocalypse” in SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES.  The first place is on page 559 where she is speaking of the angel of Revelation 10 (who is the woman God-crowned).  “This angle had in his [her] hand ‘a little book,’ open for all to read and understand.  Did this same book contain the revelation of divine Science, the ‘Right foot’ [TRUTH] or dominant power of which was upon the sea, — upon elementary, latent error, the source of all error’s visible forms?  The angel’s left foot [CHRISTIAN SCIENCE] was upon the earth; that is, a secondary power was exercised upon visible error and audible sin.” (S&H 559:1-8)  Mary Baker Eddy’s left foot is indeed upon the earth in CHRISTIAN UNITY, while the woman’s right foot in TRUTH versus ERROR stands upon a foursquare rug of divine Science.
            The second place is on page 561:  “The woman in the Apocalypse symbolizes generic man [just as the angel of Revelation 10 is of masculine gender], the spiritual idea of God; she [the woman] illustrates the coincidence of God and man as the divine Principle and divine idea.  The Revelator symbolizes Spirit by the sun.  The spiritual idea is clad with the radiance of spiritual Truth, and matter is put under her feet [she has dominion like the man/woman of Genesis 1].” (S&H 561:27)
            Thus, because the two feet are TRUTH and CHRISTIAN SCIENCE the woman God-crowned has dominion over the sea (unconscious error) and earth (conscious error).
            Now to continue on with THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT…]]
            With new economic controls nearly complete, how does the recent “collapse” of the USSR tie into the New World Order?
            The plans to bring the Soviet Union into a one-world government go back to 1907 (see Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time, by Carroll Quigley).  The very same people who established the Federal Reserve Act, the graduated income tax, and the CFR also bankrolled the Bolshevik Revolution [with Lenin and Trotsky being paid to return to Russia after being kicked out of Mother Russia.  Trotsky, who had relocated to New York City where he published a communist rag, journeyed with his comrades to Canada on their way to Russia.  However, once there they were arrested.  This arrest did not go well, and the Canadian authorities were ordered (by the U.S. and British government) to release Trotsky and his thugs.  The international bankers also paid for the hired thug rioters (they were not really dissatisfied plant workers).  Today we know them in the United States of America as groups like BLACK LIVES MATTER and ANTIFA, paid by rich man George Soros, a man out to destroy the U.S.A.].  This was a well-known fact in intelligence circles at that time.
            In 1953, CFR member H. Rowan Gaither (Chairman of Ford Foundation) made a statement to Norman Dodd (chief investigator for the special Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations):  “We shall use our grant-making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

            Consider the following excerpts from The Washington Post Weekly (May 4, 1992);  “The IMF, the World Bank, and the major industrial nations have decided to take a risk with Russia and former Soviet Republics…Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar…last week swept through Washington, reassuring business leaders, as well as finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of Seven major industrial nations.
            “In an effort to get the banking system under control, Gerald Corrigan (CFR/Tri Lat), the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, has been visiting Moscow regularly since September (1991) to advise the central bank and commercial banks.  An acquaintance of former Fed Chairman Paul A. Volcker (CFR/Tri Lat), says Volcker is close to an agreement that would make him consultant to Russian President Boris Yeltzin.
            “In addition, David Rockefeller (CFR/Tri Lat), a former Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, says he has agreed to be part of a group Corrigan is assembling that might help establish banking business in Russia.
            “Once the IMF program is in place, the World Bank will supply direct support to the agriculture and oil sectors of the Russian economy.
            “‘The oil sector is enough to solve any financial crises they (the Russians) might have’, says World Bank President Lewis Preston (CFR & formerly with Morgan Guaranty).  He says there are 33 undeveloped fields in W. Siberia.”
            Isn’t that interesting?  The Word Bank and the IMF are “supporting’ the agriculture and oil sectors thereby controlling the food and energy.  It would be more accurate to say that the CFR/Tri Lat are controlling the agriculture and oil sectors.  Furthermore, the CFR/Tri Lat involvement in Russia’s central bank has recently (July 26, 1993) mandated a call in of all pre-1993 rubles, crippling the ability of the Russian citizen to provide for his family.  [Probably post-1993 rubles are made of worthless metal.]
            Not only does the U. S. taxpayer underwrite about 20% of the IMF and World Bank funding [no surprise], but the aforementioned “G-7” central bankers are also stockholders in the Federal Reserve.
            Yeltzin is working closely with the CFR/Tri Lat – what about Gorbachev?  The transcript of Gorbachev’s May 6, 1992 speech given at Westminster College reveals the following:  “However, even now, at a time of sharply increased interdependence in the world, many countries are morbidly jealous of their sovereignty, many peoples of their national independence and identity – This is one of the newest global contradictions, one which must be overcome by joint effort.” (The River of Time and the Imperative of Action, by Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, page 9).
            [And the Democrats  (progressive communists) still insist, after a year of no proof, that there is a Russian conspiracy between President Trump and Vladimir Putten?  Does not all of the above prove that congress and the senate care nothing about a Russian conspiracy, that they just hate President Trump?  It is all just a big show for the “peoples”.  The same peoples that must loose “their national independence and identity”.]
            In Vancouver earlier this year, President Clinton promised Yeltzin $1.6 billion in direct assistance, in addition to the billions promised by the G-7.  Yet most Americans have no idea as to how long and how much Western aid and trade is gone into the USSR since 1917.

1)  after the Bolshevik Revolution [Bolshevik Riots is more like it], Standard Oil of New Jersey (Rockefeller) bought 50% of Nobel’s huge Caucasus oil fields;

2)  in 1927, Standard Oil of New York (Rockefeller) built a refinery in Russia;

3)  in 1928, Rockefeller’s Chase Bank was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the United States – patriotic organizations denounced Chase as an “international fence”.

            In the Congressional Record of June 15, 1933, Congressman Louis McFadden said:  “The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. and other banks in New York City…Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and the State Bank of the USSR and you will be staggered to see how much American money [the money is probably really gold] has been taken from the United States Treasury for the benefit of Russia.  Find out what business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York…”
            Congressman McFadden later died under “mysterious circumstances”.
            The following information is derived from Antony Sutton’s comprehensive book Best Enemy Money Can Buy, (by Antony Sutton, 1986, Liberty House Press, 2027 Iris Ln., Billings, Montana 59102).  Sutton is acknowledged as the foremost expert on western technology and Soviet economic development.
            He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institute On War and Peace; and therefore had access to information most researchers outside establishment circles were denied.  Revealing this information cost him his job.  Sutton documents that:

1)  Ford [Motor Company] set up the Gorki vehicle plant in 1929, upgraded by the Lend-Lease programs of W.W.II; vehicles produced in this plant were used against United States troops in Korea and Vietnam [no surprise];

2)  The Soviet tank industry began in 1929 under the guise of producing tread-type tractors; The Stalingrad plant was entirely constructed in the United States, dismantled, and re-erected in the USSR by American engineers.  This was just one of several which utilized American machine tools and equipment;

3)  In 1946, the Soviets bought 55 Rolls Royce turbo-jet engines from Great Britain, and reproduced them in quantity on American and German machine tools.  These engines powered the MiG-15 fighters, used against our F-86 Sabre jets in Korea;
4)  37 of the 96 Soviet ships regularly employed on the “Haiphong Run” during the Vietnam War (keeping North Vietnam supplied) used

diesel engines of western origin.  The missile-carrying Soviet ships of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis were propelled by engines produced in Denmark – a NATO ally;

5)  From 1960 until 1972, the Soviets sought acquisition of a specialized machine tool manufactured by the Bryant Chucking Company of Springfield, Vermont.  This machine, the “Centalign B”, produced high-precision miniature ball bearings, supplying 85% of its output to the United States defense industry for guidance systems in our missiles. Under President Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, approval was given in 1972 to export 164 of these machines to the USSR.  By 1974, the Soviets had MIRV’d their ICBMs.  This was made public on March 8, 1983 by Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger, stating that the greatly improved accuracy of Soviet missiles was derived from U.S. technology;  [Gee, it would not be surprising to me that the same thing has been given to North Korea or Iran!  Can there be any doubt as to why and how the Uranium One Deal (selling 20% of our yellow cake to Russia) went through without a hitch?]

6)  In the 70’s, the Kama River truck plant was built in the Soviet Union.  It covers 36 square miles and can produce 100,000 multi-axle 10-ton trucks/year.  75% of the equipment and technology is from the United States; 25% is Italian and European, including European subsidiaries of United States companies.  American taxpayers underwrote the Kama River financing through the Export/Import Bank.  Chase Manhattan (Rockefeller) was the leading financier.  It was built by the Pullman – Swindell Co. (a subsidiary of M.W. Kellogg Co.) of Pittsburgh;

7)  The Volgograd automobile plant, built 1968-1971, has a capacity of 600,000 vehicles/year.  Three-fourths of the equipment were U.S. manufacture, including key transfer lines and automated tools.  The construction contract was awarded to Fiat S.P.A., a firm closely associated with the Chase Manhattan Bank;

8)  The 647 mile highway that connects the USSR with Kabul, Afghanistan was under construction in 1966, built with Soviet and U.S. foreign aid money.  A 67 mile stretch of road through the Salang Pass cost $42 million, prompting a United States engineer to say it was the costliest section of road he had ever seen.  This highway felt the rumble of Soviet tanks, heavy trucks, and military vehicles (many produced with American equipment and money) in December, 1979 when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.  The results:  over one million casualties.

            Sutton’s book is extremely well documented.
            Richard F. Starr, a former United States Ambassador, has said that the former Soviet Union has stored at least 362 million metric tons of grain (much of it from the West), in fallout shelters.  These supplies, according to University of North Carolina economist Steven Rosefielde, could feed the entire population of the former USSR for 3-4 years.  In addition, there are reserves in 87 cities throughout the USSR giving them total reserves in excess of 5 years.  By contrast, the United States has 30-45 days of reserves.  These Soviet reserves, given to them by the United States through credits with deferred payments, are being paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.
            Senator Malcom Wallop (R-Wy) pointed out that Soviet indebtedness is estimated to be at least $100 billion and that Western loans to Soviet banks located in the West are not included in that figure; 80% of these loans are “untied”, not restricted to any program or project.  As of 1990, $700 million a month were being loaned to the Soviet government.  In the meantime, the United States has spent billions in defense budgets to protect us from those who are recipients of not only loans and credits, but our technology as well!  (Best Enemy Money Can Buy contains Appendix F:  “U.S. firms trading with the Soviet Union in the 1960-1986 period”, pages 231-235).  [This leaves me to ask the question:  Why was Hilary Clinton sent to Russia by Obama in order to push a reset button?]
            David Funderburk, former Ambassador to Romania under the Reagan Administration, stepped down from his post in protest of U.S. policy toward communist Romania and Eastern Europe.  In his books, Betrayal of America and Pinstripes and Reds, he documents the collaboration between the leadership elite of the State Department and the Communist countries:  “…we’re propping up Communist regimes which are bankrupt and would fall without our aid…aid from the United States government, from big business, and from big banks in America…” (Pinstripes and Reds, by David B. Funderburk; distributed by Betrayal of America, P.O. Box 1124, Dunn, North Carolina 28334).
            In his book, Reminiscences, John D. Rockefeller informs us:  “One of our greatest helpers has been the State Department in Washington.  Our ambassadors, and ministers, and consuls have aided to push our way into new markets to the utmost corners of the world.”
            Is it any wonder?  The CFR has dominated the State Department since W.W.II.
            Why don’t we hear about these things from the media?  At the 1991 Bilderbergers’ (European-based globalists)[28] meeting in Baden Baden, Germany, the opening speaker was David Rockefeller.  He said this:  “We are grateful to the Washington Post, New York Times, Time magazine, and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years…It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years…A supranational government by the intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to national auto-determination practiced in the past centuries.”
            Who was among the invited guests?  Bill Clinton and Dan Quayle.

            Among the communication corporations represented in the CFR/Tri Lat are these:
1)  CBS
2)  NBC
3)  ABC
4)  PBS
5)  CNN
6)  Washington Post
7)  New York Time Co.
8)  Wall Street Journal
9)  Newsweek
10)  U. S. News and World Report
11)  Time, Inc.
12)  Associated Press and Reuter’s (both of which local papers rely upon)

            CFR members who are TV news personalities include:
1)  Dan Rather
2)  Tom Brokaw
3)  David Brinkley
4)  John Chancellor
5)  Barbara Walters
6)  Diane Sawyer
7)  Robert McNeil
8)  Jim Lehrer
9)  Daniel Schorr

            [And today, just about everyone, especially those at CNN and MSNBC.  And quite possibly some at FOX NEWS.]
            David Brinkley (CFR), to a meeting of the American TV/Radio Broadcasters Association, said this of the American people:  “All they know about public policy is what we tell them.”
            Sadly enough but true.  Scripture warns us about ignorance.  Hosea 4:6:  “My people are destroyed from a lack of knowledge [Science].”
            Public ignorance and apathy are allies of the globalists [ignorance and apathy exists among The First Church of Christ Scientist members], and only recently have we heard the brazen call for a New World Order.  Yet this phrase is nothing new.  It has been on the back of a one dollar bill since 1935.  Under the pyramid is the Latin phrase “Novus Ordo Seclorum”, which means a “new secular order of the age”; in other words, a new world order without God.  [Christian Science is supposed to be the new world (Scientific) order with God!  Can you see how important it is that Christian Scientists become obedient to the Church Manual and disorganize The Mother Church into a Branch Church (with no despotic control)?  Can you begin to see how world events reflect church events?]
            The conspirators are confident of bringing in a one-world government, which includes plans to scrap our Constitution.  [The Constitution had to be formed, put into place, before Christian Science could be born into the world by Mary Baker Glover Eddy.]  They have been quietly acquiring the necessary 34 states’ approval to call up a Constitution Convention ([a] ConCon[29]) in an effort to install a new constitution.  (“New States of America” from The Emerging Constitution, by Rexford G. Tugwell, 1974, Harper & Row).  It’s already written, and has been largely promoted by a group called the Committee on a Constitutional System (CCS).  Nineteen of its 51 member board of directors are also members of CFR.

            Douglas Dillon (CFR member, former Secretary of the Treasury) said: “Such a significant shift in our Constitution is unlikely to come about except as a result of a crises that is very grave indeed.”  [Do you now understand why every time something happens with guns that the Democrats are screaming for gun control?  Some of them still call for it even if the weapon used by an Islamic terrorist happens to be a rented Home Depot Truck!  And those things aren’t cheap!  I guess they are if you never plan on paying for the bill.]

            A financial crisis today would further their goals just as it did in 1929.
            Will the new “deficit reduction bill” help the country or hasten a crisis?  The majority of the bill’s spending cuts will not take place until the President’s [Clinton’s] term is over; in the meantime, over $800 million interest will be added to the dept each and every day.
            Will a balanced budget amendment (BBA) reign in spending?  Every BBA proposal in Washington today would allow Congress to override any such amendment by a 60% vote.  If Congress were sincere, a simple majority vote in the House (218) and the Senate (51) would balance the budget.  [But they do not care to do so.]
            Remember, the country is still bankrupt.  Furthermore, the Secretary of the Treasury is also the Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  This is an alien/foreign financial institution (22 U.S.C.A. 286).  What does this mean?  Look on the back of any returned check you mailed to the IRS for federal taxes since 1976:  you will find that it has been endorsed by a Federal Reserve Bank.[30]  Who owns the Fed?  Your tax payment was allowed to go right out of the country!  The definition of the national debt means all obligations owed by the Treasury Department to its creditors i.e. the international bankers.
            The real motive behind a balanced budget amendment is not to reign in spending, but to adopt a new Constitution.  How close are they?  They have 32 of the required 34.  The American public was duped into the Federal Reserve Act.  Would it be any different now?  Hosea 4:6:  “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge [Science].”  [When will Americans begin to read SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES, by Mary Baker G. Eddy?  When The Mother Church begins to follow its true Leader instead of personal sense (five board of directors) and it disorganizes!]
            A number of things could precipitate a crisis, and like in 1929, could bring about a run on the banks.  The President could invoke “Emergency Banking Regulation No. 1”, which would restrict your right to withdraw on your bank account, and “…prohibit withdrawals of cash in any case…that such withdrawal is sought for the purpose of hoarding.”

            The following Executive Orders were combined by Richard Nixon [scum President] into EO 11490, which activates all of the following under national emergency conditions:

            A one-world government would require a world law, a world court, and for enforcement, a world army.  You can understand why our Constitution must be scrapped, because Article I, Section 8, clauses 13-16 gives Congress exclusive power over our armed forces.  The sovereignty of our nation depends upon its ability to defend itself.  Period.
            What provisions would place our armed forces under a one-world government?
            In Volume 9, of the 25 volume set of the 1982 United States Code, on pages 554-558, you will find Public Law 87-297, which calls for the disarmament of the United States.  This has been in force since 1961.  This is further explained in “The Blueprint for Peace Race” as “Publication No. 4, General Series 3” published by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, May, 1962.  An abridged version of this is State Department Document 7277.  (Department of State, Disarmament Series 5, released September 1961, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.)
            The armed forces of this country are to be, in three stages, placed under the U.N. Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs.  This position has always overseen all U.N. military operations since 1946.  It has also been held by a Soviet this entire time (except 1954-1957, held by a communist from Yugoslavia).  At the present, our troops in Somalia serve under Turkish General Bir, who answers to Russian U.N. Undersecretary Vladimir Petrovsky.  The American public is being warmed up to the idea of U.S. troops serving a foreign flag, under the auspices of “humanitarian assistance”.
            Furthermore, the disarmament plan has provisions to permanently station foreign U.N. troops in our closed military bases, for “training”.  Of course, the media will tell us how much this will help the local economies.  [If that does not work, then they will fall back on the old “you’re prejudice” ploy!]
            At the end of stage 1 (of 3 stages), one half of our armed forces are to be placed under U.N. control, and all citizen-owned guns banned, hence the myth that gun control is crime control.  What they don’t say is that, under a world government, all populations must be disarmed.  In this country, names would be collected from registration forms required by the 1968 Gun Control Act (which is patterned from the 1938 Nazi “Law on Weapons”).  [I’m not sure how well this would work since there are so many unregistered (illegal) guns in our country.  I am not sure any American citizen is willing to turn in their guns as easily as they did their gold and silver coins.]
            Why would the military leadership of this country, sworn to defend it, allow the armed forces to be placed under a United Nations flag?

            There are, however, many in our armed forces who are patriotic to this nation.  Pray for them.
            As James Madison warned, there has been a:  “…silent and gradual encroachment of those in power.”
            We are on the verge of “global tyranny”, as Jasper so aptly states.  We are a Constitutional Republic [not a Constitutional Democracy], steeped in Christian heritage and guaranteed certain God-given unalienable rights.  I will repeat this again:  we have God given rights – we are accountable to Him for everything, including our liberty and freedom.  [This is the real reason why the Insiders are against Christianity.]
            Our rights carry responsibilities.  To dismiss those responsibilities is a sin of omission, no different from a sin of commission.  God detests both.  Proverbs 13:22 says:  “A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children.”  [A stupid man leaves an inheritance to the government.]
            Over 957,00 patriotic Americans have given their lives in defense of our country.  Their legacy is the freedom and liberty we now have.  We are their posterity. Do not let their sacrifice be in vain.
            Although we are not on the battlefields of France, or an atoll in the Pacific, or a hill in Korea, or a jungle in Vietnam, or even a desert in Saudi Arabia, we are indeed engaged in a battle.  That battlefield is in America.  A war is being waged against God, family, and country.  Why?  We are not only the last bastion of freedom, but 85% of the Great Commission (Mt. 28:19, 20) emanates from America.  What can we do?

1)  Invite the Lord into your life.  Greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world (I John 4:4) [Get a copy of SCIENCE AND HEALTH and read it and practice it];

2)  Become informed, not misinformed.  You know whose camp the major media is in – and it is not in yours.  The best publication I know of for becoming informed is The New American magazine.  This is a bi-weekly publication written by people who embrace the same ideals as our Founders (P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin 54913, 1-800-341-1522);

3)  Pray for your elected representatives.  Many have forgotten what “representative” means.  Voice your concerns to them but do so from a perspective of knowledge and insight.  There are many groups who address the effects but have no insight as to the cause;

4)  Are you one of those people who say, “I don’t know where the money goes – it costs twice as much to live beyond my means as it use to?”  Romans 13:8 says:  “Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing dept to love one another.”

            If you live by the world system [not Christian Science], you will be subjugated by the same.
            Alexis De Tocqueville, in 1840, made the following observation after his visit to America:  “I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her harbors…; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of higher learning.  I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her matchless Constitution.  Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power.  America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”

                                    WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE?

                                          A NEW WORLD ORDER:

                     Which will make us, as Paul warns, “slaves of men”.

            Let each of us use our God-given abilities to help restore America back to “One Nation, Under God, Indivisible, With Liberty And Justice For All.”                     Amen.

                                                                        Richard D. Eastman

                                             Please copy and distribute.

            This is the end of the pamphlet.


[1] Because it was written so many years ago I do not know if the companies and addresses given in it are still valid.

[2] I am not sure that Christian Science should be italicized.

[3] Kratzer, Dominion Within, p. 7

[4] I do not think that SCIENCE AND HEALTH should be italicized because it is on an even par with the BIBLE.  This is why I always capitalize both books in my own writing, mainly because I cannot get this Firefox Word program to do small caps.  Like, capital “B”, and small caps “ible.”

[5] Christian Science After 1910; by Andrew W. Hartsook, p. 11-12

[6] My infuses.

[7] An offshoot of the English Round Table Groups.

[8] Christian Science After 1910; by Andrew W. Hartsook, p. 33

[9] “Studdert-Kennedy, C.S. and Organized Religion, p. 98 {My interpolations.}

[10] Christian Science After 1910; by Andrew W. Hartsook, p. 39

[11] Ibid, p. 40

[12] I think that the reason why Kennedy was really assassinated is because he went against the orders of the CFR and the mind-set of Insiders.

[13] Nixon worked for Rockefeller and lived in one of Rockefeller’s buildings (being Rockefeller’s neighbor).

[14] Like father, like son!

[15] I call them “Builderburgers”.

[16] Christian Science After 1910, by Andrew W. Hartsook, p. 107

[17] Ibid, p. 108-109

[18] Ibid, p. 111

[19] Later on Reginald Kerry wrote the Kerry Letters speaking out about corruption within the Boston Center.

[20] We knew they would!

[21] This is a Roman Catholic structure.  Ask yourselves why the Boston board of directors would place a Roman Catholic structure onto the CROWNED Extension?

[22] Are you buying into the directors line of bull?

[23] So, you see, they blatantly lied to the Field (again!).

[24] There should have been two women on the cover of the Sentinel not one lady with the lamp hiding on the inside cover!

[25] I highly disagree with them!  The board of directors made the cross and crown symbol their Trademark (their seal of error).

[26] Christian Science After 1910, by Andrew W. Hartsook, p. 129-130

[27] Does this help explain to you why the Carpenter material was not made unavailable to people after it was placed in the Archives?

[28] It is at the highly secret Bilderbergers’ meetings that the choice for the United States of America President is decided upon.  I am sure this is why Hilary Clinton was shocked when she lost the 2016 election!  I am sure that she was promised the position by the Bilderbergers.

[29] A “con” is an action put in place, or acted out upon, in order to fool the target out of something valuable.  Con, however, also means “to know”.  So if you really “know” something, such as the truth (or Truth and Christian Science), you cannot be conned into taking wrong or inappropriate action leading to some sort of loss.  Mortal mind is the only con man there is.

[30] Today the banks do not even let you see your checks, unless you specifically ask to see it, then they will give you a Photostat of the check.